Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a local e-commerce settlement checking skill, with the main caveat that it keeps a small local trial-use counter.
Installers should know this skill runs local reconciliation checks on pasted financial tables and keeps a hidden local counter for the five-use trial. Review that monetization and local state behavior if you require a fully stateless tool, but no artifact-backed exfiltration or destructive behavior was found.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
The skill advertises itself as a broad router and expert package covering 11 settlement sub-skills, but the findings indicate the implementation may only handle narrow or different scenarios. This is dangerous because users may rely on omitted checks and interpret a clean result as comprehensive coverage, causing financial misstatements, missed disputes, or incorrect operational decisions.
