Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill runs a local expense-document precheck with user-provided files and does not show hidden network, persistence, credential, or destructive behavior.
Install only if you are comfortable running a local Node-based checker on reimbursement and invoice text. Treat the output as a narrow precheck, not a full compliance, fraud, tax, or invoice-authenticity review.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
The top-level comments describe the skill entirely in Chinese, and the implementation is built around Chinese field labels and Chinese-language result messages. There is no indication that language is configurable, optional, or justified as a region-specific constraint, which can violate a language/locale policy requiring user choice or opt-in.
The design-principles comment explicitly states '绝不输出"未发现问题"'. But analyze() sets summary.verdict to '在上述检查项范围内没有发现问题 —— ...' when no P0/P1/P2 findings exist. This is an active contradiction between stated intent and actual behavior, not merely omitted detail.
The manifest says the free skill performs only duplicate invoice number detection, invoice field completeness, and placeholder residue checks. However, the file declares a larger set of withheld checks such as reimbursement total reconciliation, date logic, matching invoice totals to claim amounts, travel-policy overage hints, and tax consistency, and returns them in result.scope, while the module-level documentation at L7-L10 also presents these broader workflow checks as the engine's function. This creates a semantic mismatch about what the skill is for versus what the manifest says it does.
L076 的注释写明“不是 JSON 就当作纯文本材料(例如直接粘贴的合同全文)”,而该技能清单与清单描述都限定在报销单、发票及贴票核对场景。代码本身确实会接受任意纯文本作为输入,因此这条注释把适用材料表述得比技能声明更宽,和技能既定意图存在轻微偏离。