Ae1
- Category
- analysis-evasion
- Confidence
- 100% confidence
- Finding
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- Content
md node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This skill is a local Chinese contract-clause comparison tool with disclosed limits and no evidence of hidden network, credential, persistence, or destructive behavior.
Install only if you want a local tool for Chinese-style, same-template contract clause comparison. It can help identify missing or changed clauses, but it does not give legal advice, validate legality, inspect signatures, or perform the paid-version field/date/amount checks listed as out of scope.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
node scripts/run.mjs --sample
The description says '触发词包括' and then lists phrases such as '合同审查', '内审', and '多份合同', which are broad terms that may match many ordinary requests beyond this skill's narrow function of same-template clause comparison. The file does not provide exclusion conditions or negative examples to clarify when the skill should not activate.
This JavaScript skill is filled with Chinese-only natural-language instructions and output expectations, such as clause markers and user-facing behavior descriptions, but it does not provide any opt-in or alternative locale. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is clearly documented and justified.
The guidance tells users to provide contracts using Chinese section titles like "合同一" and clause markers like "第X条", and the insufficiency messages are also Chinese-only. This effectively imposes a specific language/locale on users without offering a choice or clearly documenting a justified regional constraint.
The only natural-language content in this manifest-style JSON file is entirely in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or user-configurable. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language or locale without user opt-in is a reportable natural-language policy violation.