Natural-Language Policy Violations
- Category
- Not specified by scanner
- Confidence
- 96% confidence
- Finding
标题与全文说明均以中文呈现,并将技能定位为固定中文输出风格,但文档中没有说明可根据用户偏好切换语言,也没有给出区域性限制的合理性说明。按照语言/locale 政策,若强制特定语言且无用户选择或明确理由,属于自然语言层面的策略问题。
- Content
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a Markdown-only Chinese test-case design skill with no executable code, persistence, credential handling, or hidden system access.
Installers should expect Chinese test-case templates and broad activation on testing-related prompts. Review output language and scope if your team needs multilingual behavior, but the artifact does not show security-sensitive execution or data handling.
标题与全文说明均以中文呈现,并将技能定位为固定中文输出风格,但文档中没有说明可根据用户偏好切换语言,也没有给出区域性限制的合理性说明。按照语言/locale 政策,若强制特定语言且无用户选择或明确理由,属于自然语言层面的策略问题。
The trigger section relies on broad natural-language examples such as '帮我写一下…测试用例' and similar generic requests, without clear exclusion conditions or stronger routing constraints. This can cause the skill to activate on loosely related prompts, leading to prompt hijacking of unrelated tasks, user confusion, and unintended disclosure or transformation of user-provided material into test artifacts.
No suspicious patterns detected.