Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
The skill appears to target a Chinese medicine knowledge graph, but it should be reviewed because it persists an API key locally and has mismatched documentation plus broad remote query behavior.
Install only if you are comfortable giving this provider an API key and sending your graph queries to its remote service. Check that the skill runs in a directory where writing a plaintext .env file is acceptable, and consider using a scoped or disposable API key because the package retains XBY_APIKEY locally.
default_year: int = 2025
def model_post_init(self, __context):
# 强制从 .env 文件读取 XBY_APIKEY
env_path = Path(".env")
if env_path.exists():
content = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")def model_post_init(self, __context):
# 强制从 .env 文件读取 XBY_APIKEY
env_path = Path(".env")
if env_path.exists():
content = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
for line in content.splitlines():def save_api_key_to_env(api_key: str) -> bool:
"""将API key保存到.env文件"""
try:
env_path = Path(".env")
lines = []
if env_path.exists():
lines = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines()def set_api_key(api_key: str) -> bool:
"""设置API key并持久化到.env"""
if not api_key or not api_key.strip():
return False
api_key = api_key.strip()requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
No suspicious patterns detected.