Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
The skill appears to be an API-backed knowledge-graph tool, but it needs review because it collects an API key through chat, stores it in a plaintext .env file, and has inconsistent copied documentation.
Install only if you are comfortable giving this skill a XiaoBenYang API key and having it saved in a plaintext .env file in the working directory. Use a limited-scope key if possible, avoid sharing sensitive data through the graph queries, and remove the stored key when you no longer need the skill.
default_year: int = 2025
def model_post_init(self, __context):
# 强制从 .env 文件读取 XBY_APIKEY
env_path = Path(".env")
if env_path.exists():
content = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")def model_post_init(self, __context):
# 强制从 .env 文件读取 XBY_APIKEY
env_path = Path(".env")
if env_path.exists():
content = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
for line in content.splitlines():def save_api_key_to_env(api_key: str) -> bool:
"""将API key保存到.env文件"""
try:
env_path = Path(".env")
lines = []
if env_path.exists():
lines = env_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines()def set_api_key(api_key: str) -> bool:
"""设置API key并持久化到.env"""
if not api_key or not api_key.strip():
return False
api_key = api_key.strip()requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
requests>=2.31.0 pydantic>=2.7.0 pydantic-settings>=2.2.0 python-dotenv>=1.0.1
No suspicious patterns detected.