T08 · Insecure Dependencies
- Location
SKILL.md:7- Finding
Financial Queries Routed Through an Opaque Third-Party MCP Gateway
- Content
View full analysis
Vulnerability Details
File Location:
SKILL.md, lines 7-11
Vulnerability Type: Third-party service and supply-chain trust risk
Risk Level: MediumVulnerable Code:
json { "mcpServers": { "fintech-intel": { "url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp?task=fintech%20analysis" } } }Technical Analysis
The Skill directs the agent to connect to a remote MCP gateway operated at
gateway.pipeworx.ioinstead of directly accessing the official SEC, CFPB, FDIC, Alpha Vantage, or FRED interfaces. This places the external gateway inside the agent's tool trust boundary.Tool arguments—including financial research queries, company interests, and any context included by the agent—may consequently be visible to the gateway. Tool definitions and responses are also controlled by the remote service and can change independently of the reviewed
SKILL.mdfile. The project provides no authentication requirements, server-integrity controls, schema pinning, privacy policy, retention limits, or instructions to treat returned content as untrusted.The configuration uses HTTPS, which protects data in transit when certificate validation operates correctly, but it does not establish that the service itself is trustworthy or that its responses accurately represent the named public data sources.
Attack Path
- A user or agent installs the MCP configuration from
SKILL.md. - The agent submits a financial-analysis request and associated arguments to
gateway.pipeworx.io. - The gateway receives the query and may observe any business-sensitive context included in it.
- A compromised or malicious gateway returns manipulated financial data, misleading text, or adversarial content in a legitimate-looking tool response.
- If the agent accepts the response without independent validation, the altered content can influence its analysis and downstream recommendations.
Impact Assessment
T ...[truncated 492 chars]
- A user or agent installs the MCP configuration from
- Remediation
View remediation
Remediation Suggestions
- Prefer direct connections to official SEC, CFPB, FDIC, Alpha Vantage, and FRED APIs where practical.
- Clearly disclose that requests transit a third-party service and obtain informed user consent before transmitting sensitive queries.
- Document the gateway's operator, privacy policy, data-retention period, deletion process, subprocessors, and security controls.
- Minimize transmitted context and prohibit sending credentials, personal data, confidential financial information, or unrelated conversation history.
- Require authenticated MCP access and validate TLS certificates without bypasses.
- Pin or validate expected tool names, argument schemas, and response schemas so unexpected server-side changes fail closed.
- Treat every remote response as untrusted data. Do not interpret response text as agent instructions or authorize actions solely from it.
- Cross-check material financial facts against the corresponding official source before presenting conclusions or making consequential recommendations.
- Apply least-privilege controls to the MCP server and restrict it to the minimum tools required for the user's request.
