Security audit

Multi-Agent Parallel Build

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a transparent guide for coordinating parallel coding agents, with some operational risks users should manage during review and integration.

Install only if you want workflow guidance for coordinating several coding agents at once. Before using it on important repositories, require separate branches or worktrees, non-overlapping file ownership, diff review, tests, and pinned or vendored frontend dependencies for generated pages.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Insecure DependenciesIntroduces malicious components through unsafe dependency sources
Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally

Findings (1)

T08 · Insecure Dependencies

Warning

Location: references/wave-planning.md:30
Finding: Unpinned Third-Party JavaScript Loaded from an External CDN
Content: View full analysis
Remediation: View remediation
/dist/chart.umd.min.js" integrity="sha384-" crossorigin="anonymous"> ``` 2. Obtain the integrity hash from a trusted source or generate and verify it against the reviewed artifact. Update the pinned version and hash only through a controlled dependency-review process. 3. Prefer vendoring the audited JavaScript asset in the project and serving it locally when deployment and licensing requirements permit. 4. Configure a restrictive Content Security Policy that limits script sources to explicitly approved origins and avoids `unsafe-inline` and `unsafe-eval`. 5. Add automated checks that reject versionless CDN package URLs and external scripts without integrity metadata. 6. Update the agent prompt template so all spawned agents receive the secure, version-pinned dependency requirement and do not recreate the unsafe pattern. ]]>

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep

Findings (1)

Missing User Warnings

Medium

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 88% confidence
Finding: The skill explicitly instructs spawning multiple coding agents in parallel and provides operational guidance, but it does not include safeguards such as mandatory human review, isolated branches/workspaces, or explicit warnings about concurrent modifications before changes are merged. In a coding-agent environment, this can lead to conflicting edits, accidental overwrites, or unreviewed code being introduced at scale, increasing the chance of security regressions or supply-chain style mistakes.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.