Back to skill

Security audit

no-uv-filter-protection

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a narrow photography advice skill about UV filters and lens protection, with no executable behavior or sensitive access.

This is reasonable to install for UV-filter and lens-protection photography advice. Be aware it may be invoked for some broader lens-care questions, so users should ask specifically about UV filters, skylight filters, flare, or harsh shooting environments when they want this guidance.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The trigger phrase "怎么保护镜头" is broader than the skill's stated scope and can cause the agent to invoke this UV-filter-specific skill for generic lens-care, storage, cleaning, or buying-advice queries. That mismatch is not directly a security exploit, but it can degrade routing accuracy and lead to irrelevant or misleading guidance being applied in the wrong context.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
81% confidence
Finding

This JSON test file contains natural-language expectations that require Chinese output/behavior (for example, the expected behavior strings are written in Chinese), but the file does not indicate that Chinese is optional or that the skill is intentionally region-specific. That can amount to a language-policy issue because it implicitly constrains evaluation to a specific language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.