ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

Ai Tool Benchmark

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple Chinese-language benchmarking guide for comparing AI tools, with no code execution, persistence, credential access, or hidden system changes.

Install only if you are comfortable using a Chinese-language benchmarking template. Treat the included AI tool scores as example or publisher-supplied claims unless the publisher provides the underlying test results and methodology.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding

The manifest description and the entire skill documentation are written in Chinese, with no indication that other languages are supported or that the user can opt into this locale. Under the policy for natural-language violations, a skill that effectively enforces a specific language without user choice should be flagged.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.