Back to skill

Security audit

java-unit-test

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese-language Java unit-testing guidance skill with no executable code, persistence, credential handling, or hidden data movement.

Install this if you want Chinese Java unit-testing guidance. Be aware that its trigger wording is broad around unit-testing questions, so it may activate during general testing discussions; review generated dependency or test changes before applying them.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill’s activation criteria are intentionally broad, covering generic unit-testing terms and common testing situations. That can cause the skill to trigger in many ordinary coding conversations, increasing the chance it overrides a more appropriate skill or injects prescriptive behavior where the user did not request this testing framework or workflow. In this context the issue is not code execution, but scope overreach and unintended influence on agent behavior.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The entire skill content is written in Chinese and does not indicate that language selection is optional or configurable. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language locale violation unless clearly justified as region-specific.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains natural-language guidance exclusively in Chinese and does not indicate that the user can choose another language. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale restriction is explicitly justified.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

This markdown file contains user-facing instructional content exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that the skill is intentionally region-specific or that users can opt into another language. Under the language/locale policy, forcing a specific language without user choice can be a natural-language policy violation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.