Back to skill

Security audit

decisive-action

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill gives disclosed guidance for deciding when an agent should ask clarifying questions, and it does not include code, persistence, credential access, or hidden data handling.

Install this only if you want your agent to ask fewer clarifying questions in low-risk, clear tasks. Keep stronger confirmation requirements for deletion, deployments, credentials, production data, security-sensitive work, migrations, or anything with irreversible impact.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The skill registers on very broad triggers like 'efficiency', 'workflow', and 'decision-making', which are common across many ordinary requests. That increases the chance this skill activates in contexts where autonomous action guidance is inappropriate, potentially suppressing needed clarification before risky actions.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Autonomous Decision Making

Medium
Category
Excessive Agency
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

This section explicitly encourages proceeding autonomously when certain subjective conditions are met, such as a 'standard approach' or presumed reversibility. In practice, those judgments can be wrong, causing the agent to take actions the user did not intend, especially in security-sensitive or operationally risky tasks.

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 57)May include surrounding context.

md
- [ ] No clear standard approach exists
- [ ] User context doesn't clarify intent

## When to Proceed Without Asking

### Default to Action For

Autonomous Decision Making

Medium
Category
Excessive Agency
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The checklist normalizes 'proceed without asking' based on assumptions like reversibility and reviewability, but review after the fact does not prevent harmful or unintended execution. This is particularly dangerous because the skill is designed to reduce clarifying questions, making under-questioning more likely in edge cases where ambiguity affects correctness or safety.

Content

Scanner excerpt · SKILL.md (reported line 70)May include surrounding context.

md
### Proceed Threshold Checklist

Proceed without asking if:
- [ ] Standard/obvious solution exists
- [ ] Easily reversible (git, backup)
- [ ] User can review before finalize

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.