Back to skill

Security audit

Expanso keyword-extract

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

The skill performs the advertised keyword extraction, but its network-facing mode can expose an unauthenticated OpenAI-backed endpoint using the operator's API key.

Review this skill before installing or running it. Use it only with non-sensitive text unless your organization permits sending that content to OpenAI, bind the HTTP mode to localhost or put it behind authentication, and use a restricted OpenAI key with spending limits if you run the server mode.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Insecure Skill Coding PracticesFinds exploitable flaws such as hardcoded secrets or command injection
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Findings (1)

T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices

Error
Location
pipeline-mcp.yaml:11
Finding
Unauthenticated Externally Bound LLM Endpoint## Vulnerability Details **File Location**: `pipeline-mcp.yaml`, lines 11-19 **Vulnerability Type**: Unauthenticated network service and unrestricted paid API access **Risk Level**: High ### Vulnerable Code ```yaml config: http: enabled: true address: "0.0.0.0:${PORT:-8080}" input: http_server: path: /extract allowed_verbs: [POST] timeout: 60s ``` Requests accepted by this endpoint are subsequently sent to OpenAI: ```yaml - openai_chat_completion: api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}" model: gpt-4o-mini ``` ### Technical Analysis The HTTP service listens on `0.0.0.0`, making it available through every network interface permitted by the host and surrounding network controls. The pipeline does not define authentication or authorization for the `/extract` endpoint. Every accepted request reaches the `openai_chat_completion` processor and uses the operator-provided `OPENAI_API_KEY`. Consequently, any client capable of reaching the service can trigger a paid third-party API operation under the operator's account. The HTTP input also lacks an explicit request-body size limit, rate limit, concurrency limit, and validated upper bound for the client-controlled `max_keywords` value. ### Attack Path 1. An attacker discovers or otherwise reaches the host's exposed port, which defaults to TCP port 8080. 2. The attacker submits unauthenticated `POST` requests to `/extract` containing arbitrary text. 3. The pipeline incorporates the attacker-controlled text and `max_keywords` value into an OpenAI request. 4. The `openai_chat_completion` processor authenticates to OpenAI using the operator's `OPENAI_API_KEY`. 5. The attacker repeats requests, or submits large request bodies, to consume API quota and local processing capacity. 6. Costs and resource consumption accrue to the service operator without the attacker needing access to the API key itself. ### Im ...[truncated 510 chars]
Remediation
## Remediation Suggestions 1. Bind the service to loopback by default, such as `127.0.0.1:${PORT:-8080}`, unless remote access is explicitly required. 2. Require authentication and authorization before allowing requests to reach the pipeline. Use short-lived credentials or securely managed API tokens. 3. If public exposure is necessary, place the service behind a TLS-enabled reverse proxy or API gateway with authentication, network access controls, and request auditing. 4. Add per-client and global rate limits, concurrency limits, request timeouts, and usage quotas. 5. Configure a strict HTTP request-body size limit appropriate for the intended workload. 6. Validate `text` as a bounded string and constrain `max_keywords` to a safe integer range, such as 1 through a documented maximum. 7. Apply OpenAI account-level spending limits, usage alerts, and restricted project credentials to limit financial impact. 8. Avoid exposing detailed credentials or sensitive request content in logs, and monitor for abnormal request volume and API spending.
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • MCP Tool PoisoningHidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (6)

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding
The README shows users supplying arbitrary text to the skill and configuring an OPENAI_API_KEY, but it does not clearly warn that submitted content may be transmitted to an external AI service. This can lead users to send sensitive, proprietary, or regulated data under the mistaken assumption processing is purely local.

External Transmission

Medium
Category
Data Exfiltration
Content
```bash
PORT=8080 expanso-edge run pipeline-mcp.yaml &
curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/extract \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"text": "Machine learning is transforming...", "max_keywords": 10}'
```
Confidence
60% confidence
Finding
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.

External Transmission

Medium
Category
Data Exfiltration
Content
#
# Usage:
#   PORT=8080 expanso-edge run pipeline-mcp.yaml &
#   curl -X POST http://localhost:8080/extract -d '{"text": "..."}'

name: "keyword-extract-mcp"
type: pipeline
Confidence
60% confidence
Finding
Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Confidence
92% confidence
Finding
User-supplied text is forwarded directly to the OpenAI API, which sends potentially sensitive input to an external third party. In a skill context, this is dangerous because users or operators may assume local processing, and the file contains no consent, warning, filtering, or policy controls to prevent accidental disclosure of secrets, personal data, or proprietary content.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding
The manifest declares an OpenAI remote backend and an OpenAI API key, which means user-supplied text may be sent to a third-party service, but it does not disclose that off-box transmission may occur. This creates a real privacy and data-handling risk because users may provide sensitive text under the assumption that processing is local, especially since the skill also advertises a local Ollama backend.

Intent-Code Divergence

Low
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding
The file comment says this is "keyword-extract (MCP mode)" and the skill name also suggests MCP usage, which implies a model-context-protocol style integration. However, the configuration explicitly enables an HTTP server bound to 0.0.0.0 and exposes a POST /extract endpoint, which is a different interface surface than the comment suggests.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.