Back to skill

Security audit

Criticism Self Criticism

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a text-only self-review checklist skill with no code execution, credential access, network behavior, or persistence.

Install this if you want a Chinese-language, Mao-influenced structured self-review workflow. Be aware that its trigger language is broad, so agents may apply it during ordinary reviews unless you give narrower instructions.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (4)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding

The trigger description is broad enough to activate in many routine review, audit, or feedback situations without clear boundaries. That can cause unintended invocation of an ideologically framed critique workflow, which may steer agent behavior away from the user's immediate task or apply an inappropriate review mode in ordinary contexts.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

Most of the skill content is presented in Chinese, with only a brief English trigger summary, and there is no statement that the user can choose their preferred language. This can amount to a language-policy issue because the skill effectively defaults to a specific language without opt-in or a documented region-specific justification.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The usage section lists many common situations such as finishing work, receiving feedback, or feeling uncertain, but does not define constraints, exclusions, or approval conditions. In an agent system, such broad guidance increases the chance the skill is applied by default, potentially overriding more suitable skills or introducing unnecessary self-criticism behavior into normal workflows.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

The manifest description is written entirely in Chinese and presents the skill as Chinese-language content without indicating any user language choice or opt-in. Under the policy rule for language/locale constraints, this can be a natural-language policy concern when a skill appears to assume a specific language by default.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.