Security audit

Systematic Literature Review

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a plain Markdown research-workflow skill that guides literature reviews without adding code, persistence, or hidden data access.

Before installing, be aware that the skill may ask you to choose language limits and may process unpublished manuscripts or participant information you provide. Use it with documents you are allowed to share, and set language criteria deliberately rather than accepting an example by default.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep

Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Category: Not specified by scanner
Confidence: 77% confidence
Finding: The markdown includes default example criteria that explicitly include English studies and exclude non-English studies. Because this is natural-language guidance in a generally applicable review skill, it can steer users toward a language restriction without offering a language choice or documenting a justified regional constraint.
Content: No source excerpt is available for this finding.