Deep Research

Universal deep research with 13-agent pipeline on Hermes Agent. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, systematic review with meta-analysis. Uses delegate_task for each agent. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清.

Audits

Pass

ClawScanPass

Agentic behavior and permission review.

Static analysisPass

Pattern checks against bundled files.

VirusTotalPass

Multi-engine malware detections and file reputation.

Install

openclaw skills install ars-deep-research

Deep Research — Universal Academic Research (Hermes Edition)

📄 License: CC BY-NC 4.0 · Copyright (c) 2026 Cheng-I Wu
🔗 Original: Imbad0202/academic-research-skills v2.9.3
🔄 Adaptation: Multi-agent pipeline implemented via delegate_task instead of Claude Code's internal agent system. All agent definitions, references, templates, and quality standards preserved unchanged from original. This adaptation is distributed under the same CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Model: Uses deepseek-v4-pro (1M context / 384K max_tokens) for all agent tasks.

Quick Start

Research the impact of AI on higher education quality assurance

Execution (Hermes orchestrator + delegate_task):

Scoping — delegate_task(research_question_agent + research_architect_agent)
Investigation — delegate_task(bibliography_agent + source_verification_agent)
Analysis — delegate_task(synthesis_agent + devils_advocate_agent)
Composition — delegate_task(report_compiler_agent)
Review — delegate_task(editor_in_chief + ethics_review + devils_advocate)
Revision — delegate_task(report_compiler_agent)

Hermes-Specific Execution Model

Core pattern: The main Hermes agent is the ORCHESTRATOR. Each research phase spawns subagents via delegate_task. The orchestrator manages:

Phase sequencing and checkpoint gating
Context handoff between phases
Quality enforcement (failure = halt and get user input)
Mode selection (full/quick/socratic/etc.)

Agent files at agents/ contain specialized prompts loaded as context in delegate_task.

Reference files at references/ provide domain knowledge injected as-needed.

Phase 1: SCOPING

Step 1.1: Research Question

delegate_task(
    goal="Transform the research topic '[USER_TOPIC]' into a precise, FINER-scored research question with scope boundaries. Output: RQ Brief with 2-3 sub-questions.",
    context="Use the agent definition at agents/research_question_agent.md for the full methodology. Apply FINER criteria (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant).",
    toolsets=["file", "web"]
)

Step 1.2: Methodology Blueprint

delegate_task(
    goal="Design a methodology blueprint for the research question: [RQ_FROM_STEP_1]. Include: research paradigm, method selection, data strategy, analytical framework, validity criteria.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/research_architect_agent.md. Reference: references/methodology_patterns.md.",
    toolsets=["file", "web"]
)

Checkpoint 1 — Devil's Advocate

delegate_task(
    goal="Review the Research Question Brief and Methodology Blueprint. Test for: RQ clarity, method appropriateness, scope validity. Output verdict: PASS or REVISE with specific feedback.",
    context="You are the Devil's Advocate. Use agent definition at agents/devils_advocate_agent.md. Reference: references/logical_fallacies.md, references/cross_agent_quality_definitions.md.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

⚠️ CRITICAL issues → HALT. Require user correction. User must confirm before Phase 2.

Phase 2: INVESTIGATION

Step 2.1: Literature Search

delegate_task(
    goal="Conduct a systematic literature search for [RQ]. Output: search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, PRISMA-style flow, annotated bibliography in APA 7.0.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/bibliography_agent.md. Reference: references/apa7_style_guide.md, references/source_quality_hierarchy.md.",
    toolsets=["file", "web"]
)

Step 2.2: Source Verification

delegate_task(
    goal="Verify and grade all sources from the bibliography. Apply evidence hierarchy grading (Level I-VII), predatory journal screening, conflict-of-interest flagging. Output: Verified & Graded Sources + Source Quality Matrix.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/source_verification_agent.md. Reference: references/source_quality_hierarchy.md, references/cross_agent_quality_definitions.md.",
    toolsets=["file", "web"]
)

Phase 3: ANALYSIS

Step 3.1: Cross-Source Synthesis

delegate_task(
    goal="Synthesize findings across all verified sources. Identify themes, contradictions, knowledge gaps. Output: Synthesis Narrative + Gap Analysis with evidence convergence/divergence mapping.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/synthesis_agent.md. Reference: references/argumentation_reasoning_framework.md, references/interdisciplinary_bridges.md.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

Checkpoint 2 — Devil's Advocate

delegate_task(
    goal="Review the synthesis. Check for cherry-picking, confirmation bias, logic chain validity, alternative explanations. Output verdict: PASS or REVISE.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/devils_advocate_agent.md. Reference: references/logical_fallacies.md.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

Phase 4: COMPOSITION

delegate_task(
    goal="Compile a full APA 7.0 research report from all prior materials. Structure: Title → Abstract → Intro → Lit Review → Methodology → Findings → Discussion → Conclusion → References. Word count: 3,000-8,000.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/report_compiler_agent.md. Reference: references/apa7_style_guide.md. Include all prior phase outputs as context.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

Phase 5: REVIEW (3 agents in parallel)

# Run all three simultaneously
delegate_task(tasks=[
    {
        "goal": "Editorial review: assess originality, rigor, evidence sufficiency, argument coherence, writing quality. Verdict: ACCEPT/MINOR/MAJOR/REJECT with line feedback.",
        "context": "Use agent definition at agents/editor_in_chief_agent.md. Reference: references/apa7_style_guide.md.",
        "toolsets": ["file"]
    },
    {
        "goal": "Ethics review: AI disclosure compliance, attribution integrity, dual-use screening, fair representation. Verdict: CLEARED/CONDITIONAL/BLOCKED.",
        "context": "Use agent definition at agents/ethics_review_agent.md. Reference: references/ethics_checklist.md, references/irb_decision_tree.md.",
        "toolsets": ["file"]
    },
    {
        "goal": "Final vulnerability scan: strongest counter-argument test, significance check, alternative explanations. Verdict: PASS/REVISE.",
        "context": "Use agent definition at agents/devils_advocate_agent.md. Reference: references/logical_fallacies.md.",
        "toolsets": ["file"]
    }
])

Phase 6: REVISION

delegate_task(
    goal="Revise the full report addressing all Phase 5 feedback. Incorporate editorial, ethics, and devil's advocate insights. Max 2 revision loops. Remaining issues → Acknowledged Limitations section.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/report_compiler_agent.md. Include all Phase 5 review outputs and the current draft.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

Mode Selection

Before starting, determine the mode based on user intent:

Mode	Phases Active	Output	Word Count
`full` (default)	All 6 phases	Full APA 7.0 report	3,000-8,000
`quick`	Phase 1(RQ) + 2(Biblio+Verification) + 4(Report)	Research brief	500-1,500
`review`	Phase 5 only	Reviewer report on provided text	N/A
`lit-review`	Phase 2 + 3	Annotated bibliography + synthesis	1,500-4,000
`fact-check`	Phase 2.2 only	Verification report	300-800
`socratic`	Socratic Mentor (see below)	Research Plan Summary	N/A
`systematic-review`	All phases + RoB + Meta-Analysis	PRISMA 2020 report	5,000-15,000

Mode Selection Logic:

User has clear RQ and needs full report → full
User has vague idea, needs guidance → socratic
User has paper to evaluate → review
User needs quick summary → quick
User only needs literature → lit-review
User needs to verify claims → fact-check
PRISMA-compliant review needed → systematic-review

When ambiguous between socratic and full, prefer socratic.

Socratic Mode

5-layer dialogue guiding users from vague ideas to concrete research questions.

Core principle: ⚠️ Never give direct answers. Guide through questions.

Agent (single delegate_task per layer):

delegate_task(
    goal="Layer [N] Socratic dialogue for research topic: [USER_TOPIC]. Previous layers: [LAYER_OUTPUTS]. Ask questions that probe [LAYER_FOCUS]. Never give answers.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md. Reference: references/socratic_mode_protocol.md, references/socratic_questioning_framework.md.",
    toolsets=["file"]
)

Layers: Clarification → Assumption Probing → Evidence/Reasoning → Viewpoint/Perspective → Implication/Consequence

Auto-end after 10 rounds without convergence → suggest switching to full mode.

Systematic Review Mode

PRISMA 2020-compliant. Adds two extra agents:

# After Phase 2 bibliography:
delegate_task(goal="Assess risk of bias using RoB 2 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (non-randomized). Traffic-light visualization.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/risk_of_bias_agent.md. Reference: references/systematic_review_toolkit.md.",
    toolsets=["file"])

# After Phase 3 synthesis:
delegate_task(goal="Design and execute meta-analysis or narrative synthesis. Effect sizes, heterogeneity (I²), GRADE assessment.",
    context="Use agent definition at agents/meta_analysis_agent.md. Reference: references/systematic_review_toolkit.md.",
    toolsets=["file"])

Critical Rules (IRON RULES)

⚠️ Every claim must have a citation — no unsupported assertions
⚠️ Gray zone = FAIL — if you cannot confirm a reference exists, it does not go in the report
⚠️ Devil's Advocate CRITICAL → HALT — explain the issue, require user correction
⚠️ Ethics BLOCKED → HALT — list issues and remediation path
⚠️ Max 2 revision loops — remaining issues become Acknowledged Limitations
⚠️ User confirmation after Phase 1 — do not auto-continue
Vibe citing = forbidden — every reference must be independently verifiable
No phase skipping — complete each phase fully before moving to next

Orchestrator Checklist

Before starting each phase, the orchestrator (main Hermes agent) MUST:

Verify the previous phase checkpoint passed
Load the relevant agent file via read_file
Pass all prior outputs as context to delegate_task
Review subagent output before proceeding
Respect HALT conditions (ask user, don't auto-fix)

Failure Paths

Scenario	Recovery
RQ cannot converge	Provide 3 candidate RQs, suggest lit-review
Insufficient literature (<5 sources)	Expand search strategy, suggest alternative keywords
Devil's Advocate CRITICAL	HALT, explain, require correction
Ethics BLOCKED	HALT, list issues
Socratic non-convergence (>10 rounds)	Suggest switching to full mode

Agent File References

Agent	File
research_question_agent	agents/research_question_agent.md
research_architect_agent	agents/research_architect_agent.md
bibliography_agent	agents/bibliography_agent.md
source_verification_agent	agents/source_verification_agent.md
synthesis_agent	agents/synthesis_agent.md
report_compiler_agent	agents/report_compiler_agent.md
editor_in_chief_agent	agents/editor_in_chief_agent.md
devils_advocate_agent	agents/devils_advocate_agent.md
ethics_review_agent	agents/ethics_review_agent.md
socratic_mentor_agent	agents/socratic_mentor_agent.md
risk_of_bias_agent	agents/risk_of_bias_agent.md
meta_analysis_agent	agents/meta_analysis_agent.md
monitoring_agent	agents/monitoring_agent.md

All agent files are the original v2.9.3 definitions with unchanged methodology. They are loaded as context in delegate_task calls.

Output Language

Follow user's language. Academic terminology kept in English.

Anti-Patterns

#	Anti-Pattern	Correct Behavior
1	Confirmation bias in source selection	Devil's Advocate checkpoint must include counter-evidence search
2	Cherry-picking evidence	Report full evidence landscape including conflicting findings
3	Vibe citing (mixing elements from 2-3 real papers into fake reference)	Every reference must be verified independently
4	⚠️ Treating "difficult to verify" as acceptable	Gray zone = FAIL
5	Skipping phases	Complete each phase fully
6	Shallow Socratic mode	Ask genuine questions, never lead to predetermined conclusions
7	Source tier inflation	Apply evidence hierarchy strictly

Handoff to academic-paper

After research complete, these materials can be handed off:

Research Question Brief
Methodology Blueprint
Annotated Bibliography
Synthesis Report
[If socratic] INSIGHT Collection and Research Plan Summary

User says "now help me write a paper" → switch to academic-paper skill.

Security & Privacy

Multi-agent design disclosure: This skill delegates research tasks across multiple subagents via delegate_task. Research content and intermediate outputs are processed by these agents. Use only with research topics you are comfortable processing through the AI provider's delegated-agent workflow.

Tool access: Subagents are granted file tools (for writing output) and web tools (for literature search only). No terminal or system tools are exposed during review/composition phases.

Agent files: The agents/ directory contains academic research prompt templates (role definitions, methodology guidelines, quality rubrics). These are task instructions loaded as context in delegate_task calls — NOT system prompt overrides. Frontmatter in agent files (e.g., name:, description:) is metadata only.