Security audit

点教 Amulett

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Chinese-language spiritual reflection and meditation skill with no evidence of hidden access, persistence, network use, or destructive behavior.

Install this only if you want a Chinese-language spiritual reflection aid. Be aware that common words like meditation or reflection may invoke it more often than intended.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns

Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns

Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (5)

Vague Triggers

Medium

Confidence: 96% confidence
Finding: The trigger set is overly broad because it includes common, context-agnostic words such as "冥想" (meditation), "反思" (reflection), and short tokens like "NEO" and "归一" that may appear in normal conversation. This can cause unintended activation of the skill, leading the assistant to enter a spiritual-practice mode when the user did not intend to invoke it, which is especially sensitive given the quasi-religious context of the skill.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium

Confidence: 82% confidence
Finding: The entire skill content is written in Chinese and does not indicate any option for alternative languages or user opt-in. Under the policy rule for natural-language violations, a skill that imposes a specific language without offering choice can be considered a locale/language policy issue.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Confidence: 81% confidence
Finding: The skill content, headings, and operating instructions are written in Chinese, but the file does not indicate that this is optional or region-specific, nor does it offer users a language/locale choice. This can amount to a language policy issue when users are implicitly forced into a specific language without opt-in.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Confidence: 90% confidence
Finding: This markdown skill presents all guidance in Chinese and does not indicate that the user can choose another language. Under the natural-language policy rules, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a policy concern unless the locale constraint is clearly documented and justified.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low

Confidence: 84% confidence
Finding: The docstring, prompts, and user-facing output are primarily in Chinese, and the script does not offer any language selection or indicate that the locale is intentionally region-specific. This can violate language/locale policy when users are not given a choice or informed of the constraint.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.