ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

Academic Paper Writing Style

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a Markdown-only academic writing reference skill, and its Chinese/English paper-writing guidance is coherent with its stated purpose.

Before installing, consider whether you want a Chinese-first academic writing reference. Also verify journal formatting requirements against the target journal's current author instructions, since formatting rules can change.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (4)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
87% confidence
Finding
The manifest description is written as a Chinese-only skill description and presents the skill as guidance for Chinese/English paper writing without any statement that the user may choose the response language. Under the policy, language or locale constraints should either be optional or clearly offered as a user choice unless justified as region-specific.

Ae4

Medium
Category
analysis-evasion
Confidence
80% confidence
Finding
Suspicious Unicode normalization or mixed-script content

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding
The file is written as a Chinese-only reference library and its title and section content indicate a fixed language/locale for use, without offering any user opt-in or alternative locale. The policy explicitly flags language or locale constraints unless they are optional or clearly justified as region-specific.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
77% confidence
Finding
The markdown states that certain journal submissions require bilingual Chinese/English elements and describes them as fully bilingual formatting requirements. Because the file presents locale-specific requirements without clearly framing them as applying only when targeting those specific Chinese journals, this can be read as a language-policy constraint without explicit user opt-in.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.