T09 · Insecure Skill Coding Practices
- Location
scripts/main.py:108- Finding
Mandatory PHI and PII Safeguard Is Not Implemented
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
The skill is not malicious, but it should be reviewed because it promises compliance and PHI safeguards that its included script does not implement.
Install only with review. Treat outputs as drafts for qualified IRB, legal, regulatory, and clinical review, and do not process identifiable patient documents unless you have authorization and understand that the included script does not enforce the promised PHI/PII warning or compliance checks.
scripts/main.py:108Mandatory PHI and PII Safeguard Is Not Implemented
scripts/main.py:17Unsupported Compliance-Preservation Claims and Blind Replacement of Legally Significant Terms
The skill claims it will preserve FDA 21CFR50, ICH-GCP, HIPAA, and required consent elements, but the described behavior provides only textual simplification guidance with no concrete compliance verification or safeguards against altering legally significant language. In a medical/regulatory context, this mismatch is dangerous because users may rely on the tool's claims and distribute noncompliant or misleading consent documents that omit risks, distort procedures, or mishandle protected health information.
The skill advertises file-based operation (--input, --output) and the quick-start/examples indicate local file read/write behavior, but it declares no explicit tool scope or permissions. In an agent environment, undeclared file-write capability weakens sandboxing and user expectations, creating risk of unauthorized writes, overwrites, or persistence of sensitive consent documents containing PHI.
No suspicious patterns detected.