Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This is a documentation-only psychology research design assistant with no code execution, persistence, credentials, or hidden data access.
Install this if you want a Chinese-language assistant for psychology research design and review. Before relying on its output, verify any cited literature, measurement scales, legal or ethics requirements, and institution-specific approval obligations yourself; the skill says it does not replace ethics approval or clinical judgment.
This markdown file contains user-facing natural-language instructions exclusively in Chinese, and it does not state that the skill supports other languages or that Chinese output is optional. Per the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is documented and justified.
The display name, short description, and default prompt are all written exclusively in Chinese, which indicates the skill is intended to operate in a fixed language. There is no visible opt-in, language-selection mechanism, or justification that this is a region-specific tool, so this appears to violate the language/locale policy criteria.
The entire skill example is written in Chinese and does not indicate that language selection is optional or limited to a justified region-specific use case. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
The file's instructional content is entirely in Chinese, including the title, prompt, routing guidance, and output requirements. This can constitute a language-policy violation because it forces a specific language without any user opt-in or explanation that the skill is intended only for Chinese-language use.
The entire skill example is written in Chinese and provides no indication that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The entire checklist is written only in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-language context. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
The entire skill content is written in Chinese, with no indication that language selection is optional or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all user-facing instructional content exclusively in Chinese, which can amount to a language-policy violation when no opt-in or locale justification is provided. The file does not indicate that the skill is region-specific or that users may choose their preferred language.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese and presents guidance exclusively in that language, with no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the stated policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all instructions and guidance exclusively in Chinese, which effectively forces a specific language for users. The policy allows locale constraints only when they are explicitly justified or when users are offered a choice, neither of which appears here.
This markdown template is written entirely in Chinese, including the title and authoring instructions, which effectively constrains the skill's output language. The file does not indicate that Chinese is optional, user-selected, or required for a region-specific purpose, so it appears to impose a locale without opt-in.
The entire skill example is written in Chinese and presents its prompt and expected routing/output only in that language, with no indication that the user can choose another language. Under the policy rule, forcing a specific language without opt-in or clear region-specific justification is a natural-language policy violation.
This markdown file presents all guidance in Chinese and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to Chinese-speaking users. That can violate a language/locale policy if skills are expected to avoid forcing a specific language without user opt-in.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese and provides no indication that users may choose another language or opt in to this locale. Under the policy, a skill that enforces a specific language without user choice is a natural-language policy violation unless the locale constraint is explicitly justified.
The entire skill file is written in Chinese and provides no indication that the user may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy, forcing a specific language without user opt-in is a natural-language policy concern.
This markdown file uses Chinese throughout and does not indicate that the user can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-speaking context. Under the policy rule for language/locale constraints, forcing a specific language without opt-in can be a natural-language policy issue.
The markdown template uses Chinese section headings throughout, which indicates a fixed output language. The policy forbids forcing a specific language without user opt-in, and this file does not provide any language choice or documented locale-specific justification.
This markdown template is primarily written in Chinese but includes fixed English labels such as 'STANDARD / DEEP', 'Research Design Audit', and severity terms 'Critical, Moderate, Minor'. That imposes a mixed language/locale output style without explicitly offering the user a language preference or documenting a justified locale constraint.
