Agent-Friendly Design
v1.0.0Design websites and applications that AI agents can consume, navigate, and interact with. Use when building any site, app, or product that agents will use as...
⭐ 0· 96·0 current·0 all-time
byai-ron@aa-on-ai
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
The name and description match the SKILL.md guidance: advice about semantic HTML, ARIA, JSON-LD, llms.txt, crawlability, and predictable interactions. There are no unrelated requirements (no credentials, binaries, or installs) that would be disproportionate to the stated purpose.
Instruction Scope
The runtime instructions are a static checklist and do not instruct the agent to read local files, environment variables, or send data to unexpected external endpoints. The guidance does recommend site changes (robots.txt, sitemap, server-side rendering), which is appropriate for the stated goal of improving agent consumability.
Install Mechanism
There is no install spec and no code files—this is instruction-only, the lowest-risk category for installation behavior.
Credentials
The skill declares and requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. The recommendations (e.g., adding llms.txt or updating robots.txt) do not require platform credentials from the skill itself.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false and default model-invocation are set; there is no mechanism for persistent agent-side installation or privilege escalation. As an instruction-only skill it cannot modify other skills or system-wide settings.
Assessment
This skill is a coherent, low-risk checklist for making sites agent-friendly. Before applying the recommendations in production: (1) be deliberate about robots.txt/llms.txt changes — allowing more automated agents increases scraping and automated traffic; (2) ensure structured data (JSON-LD) does not leak private or sensitive fields; (3) keep structured data in sync with visible content to avoid SEO penalties; (4) test SSR/prerendering and accessibility changes in staging to confirm no unintended info exposure or regressions; and (5) add rate-limiting / abuse protections if you expect increased agent traffic. If you want further review, provide specific pages or implementation plans and I can point out concrete risks or checks.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk971jr27x0zyyj341bjsf86a8x8389bq
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.