Install
openclaw skills install phy-twitter-x-gtmTwitter/X go-to-market strategy for founders and product builders. Use when planning Twitter content strategy, analyzing engagement, identifying accounts to engage with, or creating content for Western audiences and investors. Triggers on "Twitter strategy", "X posting", "founder brand on Twitter", "reach investors on X", "DTC Twitter", or any Twitter/X marketing planning.
openclaw skills install phy-twitter-x-gtmFounder-led personal brand strategy targeting DTC brands and investors with blunt, sharp, authentic voice.
Every time creating Twitter/X content, follow this workflow:
Required Actions:
Search Examples:
Twitter [topic] viral thread
site:twitter.com founder [topic] lessons
[topic] "here's what I learned" site:x.com
| Dimension | What to Extract |
|---|---|
| Hook Formula | First line that stops scroll |
| Thread Structure | How points are organized |
| Number Usage | Dollar amounts, percentages, timeframes |
| Engagement Bait | What makes people reply |
| Punch/Rhythm | Sentence length and cadence |
Brand Voice:
Adaptation Rules:
Deliverables Checklist:
Voice: Blunt, sharp, authentic — "build-in-public meets sharp takes" Audiences: DTC brand operators, investors/VCs, AI/tech community Differentiation: Anti-AI-slop positioning — real human voice with builder credibility
| Element | Spec |
|---|---|
| Frequency | 3-5 quality tweets/day |
| Threads | 1-2x/week, 7-10 tweets optimal |
| Best times | 9-10 AM EST, 1-3 PM EST |
| Best days | Tuesday, Wednesday, Monday |
| Reply target | 50 quality replies/day (growth phase) |
Transformation: "6 months ago I was X. Today Y. Here's the playbook:"
Contrarian: "Everyone's building X. Here's why that's actually smart:"
Authority + Promise: "I've done X. Here are the Y patterns:"
Curiosity Gap: "I discovered ONE thing that 10x'd my Z. It has nothing to do with [obvious]:"
Use:
Avoid:
Pre-Event: 2-3 tweets/day During Event: 3-5 tweets/day (real-time value) Post-Event: 2-3 tweets/day + 1 thread
1/ Hook: "Money I wasted at CES..." or "Lessons from my second CES..."
2-6/ Individual points with specifics
7/ Summary/key takeaway
8/ Call for engagement: "What's your experience?"
| Type | Example | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Prep tweets | "CES countdown: 9 days. Here's my checklist:" | Pre-event |
| Real-time observations | "Just walked Eureka Park. 3 things that surprised me:" | During |
| Quick tips | "CES pro tip: Comfortable shoes > dress shoes" | Anytime |
| Contrarian takes | "80% of CES booths aren't worth your time. Here's how to find the 20%:" | Post-event |
| Number-driven | "I wasted $1,400 at my first CES. Here's the breakdown:" | Post-event |
User Input:
"帮我写一条关于 CES 的 tweet"
Expected Output:
Main Tweet:
"Lesson from CES: The founders who got meetings weren't the loudest. They were the ones who booked 6 weeks early.
90% of Brella meetings are scheduled before the event starts. I learned this the hard way last year."
Self-reply (post 10 min later):
"The real flex at CES isn't your booth. It's your calendar."
Schedule: 9:00 AM EST Tuesday
Character count: 248 ✓
User Input:
"写一个关于 AI creative tools 的 thread"
Expected Output:
1/ Most AI creative tools have a dirty secret.
They make everything look the same.
Here's what I learned testing 15+ tools for brand creative:
2/ The problem isn't the AI.
It's that these tools optimize for "good enough" — not "on-brand."
3/ After 6 months of testing:
- Midjourney: Great art, zero brand memory
- ChatGPT: Generic copy every time
- Jasper: Templates that sound like everyone else
4/ The missing piece: Brand Memory.
Not a new term. It's how the best brand teams already work — they have a "brand bible" in their heads.
5/ What if AI could learn that bible?
That's what we're building at [Your Company].
6/ Early results:
- 10 hours saved per week
- Creative that actually passes brand review first time
- No more "make it more on-brand" feedback loops
7/ The shift happening now:
From: AI that generates content
To: AI that generates YOUR content
Who else is tired of generic AI output?
---
Thread length: 7 tweets ✓
Hook formula: "dirty secret" (curiosity gap) ✓
Includes numbers: 15+ tools, 6 months, 10 hours ✓
CTA: Question at end ✓
User Input:
"我们刚 ship 了一个新功能,帮我写个 tweet"
Response Pattern:
Example Output:
"Shipped: Auto-brand-check for ad creative.
Before: 3 rounds of revision to pass brand review.
After: 90% first-time approval rate.
The surprising part: Most rejections weren't about design. They were about tone."
Canlah AI — Run performance marketing without breaking your brand.