Back to skill

Security audit

设计框架套件 - 确认处理器

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a small confirmation-handler skill that uses temporary marker files for a design workflow, with no evidence of hidden code, exfiltration, persistence, or privilege escalation.

Install this only if you are using the related design-framework suite and are comfortable with Chinese trigger phrases. In group chats, consider narrowing confirmation phrases so casual replies like ok do not accidentally confirm a pending preview.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (3)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The skill treats broad everyday replies such as “好的”, “ok”, “可以”, and “行” as confirmation commands. In a group or multi-turn context, these generic acknowledgements can easily appear in unrelated conversation or in response to something else, causing unintended state changes such as marking a design task confirmed and triggering downstream generation.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The manifest description is written entirely in Chinese and describes the skill’s behavior without any indication that language is configurable or limited to a justified region-specific use case. This can reflect a language/locale policy issue because it implies the skill is targeted to a single language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding

The entire skill description and user-facing command vocabulary are specified only in Chinese, with no indication that the user can choose another language or locale. This can constitute a language policy issue when the skill behavior is constrained to one language without explicit opt-in or documented justification.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.