Back to skill

Security audit

技能创建指南

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple Markdown guide for creating and publishing ClawHub skills, with no executable code or sensitive access.

Before installing, confirm that a Chinese-language ClawHub skill-creation guide and its broad trigger phrases fit your workspace conventions. It does not appear to request sensitive access or run code.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
91% confidence
Finding

The listed trigger phrases "创建技能 / 技能模板 / 发布技能" are short natural-language phrases without scope constraints or negative examples. In particular, "创建技能" and "发布技能" could match ordinary conversation about skills rather than a narrowly defined invocation condition for this specific guide skill.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
88% confidence
Finding

The file uses Chinese in the description and trigger guidance, but does not indicate that users can choose another language or that the Chinese-only presentation is intentional and justified. This can be a language policy concern if the organization expects skills not to force a specific language without user opt-in.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.