Back to skill

Security audit

Auto Llm 1644 1db0d0

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This is a simple Chinese-language reference skill with no code, credential use, persistence, or hidden behavior found.

Installing this skill should be low risk. Users should expect Chinese-language reference guidance about the named auto_llm_1644 topic; the main practical caveat is that its trigger wording may activate for broad related requests.

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (2)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
93% confidence
Finding

The trigger conditions are broad and loosely scoped: they activate not only on the exact skill name but also on a generic term and any request for related help. In an agent environment, this can cause unintended invocation, context hijacking, or routing of unrelated user requests into this skill, increasing the chance of misexecution or policy bypass through overmatching.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
85% confidence
Finding

The skill description and instructional content are entirely presented in Chinese, with no indication that users can choose another language or that the skill is intentionally restricted to Chinese-speaking users. This creates a natural-language policy concern if the skill is expected to operate generally rather than as a clearly documented locale-specific tool.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.