ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

Title Contribution Checker - 标题贡献度检查

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a simple academic-title review rubric with no code execution, data access, persistence, or hidden behavior.

Install this if you want Chinese-language guidance for judging academic paper title contribution. Expect text-only review output; there is no evidence of commands, external calls, credential use, or persistent changes.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
  • Excessive AgencyUnrestricted Tool Access, Autonomous Decision Making, Scope Creep
Findings (1)

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
90% confidence
Finding

The manifest description and all user-facing instructions are written exclusively in Chinese, and there is no indication that users may choose another language or that the skill is intentionally limited to a Chinese-only context. This creates a natural-language policy concern because it imposes a locale/language expectation without explicit opt-in or justification.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.