Arxiv Paper Writer

Dev Tools

Use this skill whenever the user wants Claude Code to write, scaffold, compile, debug, or review an arXiv-style academic paper, especially survey papers with LaTeX, BibTeX citations, TikZ figures, tables, and PDF output. This skill should trigger for requests like writing a full paper, creating an arXiv paper project, turning a research topic into a LaTeX manuscript, reproducing the Paper-Write-Skill-Test agent-survey workflow, or setting up a Windows/Linux Claude Code paper-writing loop.

Install

openclaw skills install arxiv-paper-writer

arxiv-paper-writer

This skill guides Claude Code through an end-to-end arXiv-style paper workflow: plan the paper, initialize a LaTeX project, build a BibTeX library, write sections incrementally, create figures/tables, compile, debug, and perform a final quality review.

Core principle

Treat paper writing as an engineering loop, not a one-shot generation task. Work in small verifiable stages: plan, scaffold, cite, write, compile, inspect, repair, and review.

When starting a paper project

  1. Clarify topic, paper type, target length, audience, and whether the user wants a survey, methods paper, benchmark paper, position paper, or tutorial.
  2. Create or reuse a paper directory with main.tex, references.bib, figures/, sections/, and output/.
  3. Use templates/arxiv_survey_main.tex for a compact starter survey, or templates/full_survey_main.tex when the user wants the richer 9-section scaffold proven in the Agent Survey experiment.
  4. Read references/workflow.md for the full staged process.
  5. Read only the reference files needed for the current phase.
  6. When the user asks to reproduce the Paper-Write-Skill-Test workflow, use references/agent_survey_practice.md, templates/agent_survey_references.bib, and templates/agent_survey_figures_tables.tex as concrete examples.

Workflow phases

Phase 1: Plan

Create a concrete paper plan before writing prose. Include title candidates, scope, contribution claims, section outline, target references, expected figures/tables, and verification commands.

Phase 2: Scaffold

Create a compilable LaTeX skeleton first. The first milestone is a PDF that compiles even before the paper is complete.

Phase 3: Build bibliography

Construct references.bib before heavy writing. Prefer real, verifiable papers. Use stable BibTeX keys. Avoid invented citations. If uncertain about a reference, mark it for verification rather than fabricating metadata.

Phase 4: Write sections incrementally

Write one or two sections at a time. After each substantial section, compile or at least check citations and LaTeX syntax. Write Abstract last.

Phase 5: Create figures and tables

Prefer TikZ and LaTeX tables for reproducible academic artifacts. Keep figures information-dense and directly connected to claims in the text.

Phase 6: Compile and debug

Use latexmk on Linux when available. On Windows MiKTeX, use pdflatex, bibtex, pdflatex, pdflatex. Read .log files before guessing fixes.

Phase 7: Final review

Check PDF generation, citation completeness, undefined references, figure/table placement, academic tone, contribution clarity, and arXiv compatibility.

Environment guidance

  • For Windows MiKTeX and Linux TeX Live basics, read references/latex_environment.md.
  • For fuller Linux cloud setup and verification, read references/linux_texlive_full.md.
  • For BibTeX construction, read references/bibliography.md.
  • For figure and table design, read references/figures_and_tables.md and optionally reuse templates/agent_survey_figures_tables.tex.
  • For final review, read references/quality_review.md.
  • For reusable task prompts, read references/prompt_templates.md.

Output style

When writing project files, edit the actual .tex, .bib, and documentation files. Do not merely describe what should be written. When explaining progress to the user, summarize briefly in Chinese and reference exact file paths.