T06 · System Persistence
- Location
scripts/add_task.js:406- Finding
Automatic Installation of Persistent Cron Jobs Without Explicit User Consent
- Content
View full analysis
- Remediation
View remediation
Security audit
Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk
This worklist skill is mostly coherent, but it needs review because it can create persistent reminders automatically and has unsafe command and credential configuration handling.
Review before installing. Only use this skill if you are comfortable giving it Feishu Bitable read/write authority, access to Feishu app credentials, permission-management ability, and persistent OpenClaw reminders. The automatic cron setup and unsafe open_id/config handling should be fixed before normal use.
scripts/add_task.js:406Automatic Installation of Persistent Cron Jobs Without Explicit User Consent
scripts/setup_reminders.js:160Shell Command Injection Through the Open ID Parameter
scripts/set_config.js:43Executable JavaScript Injection and Plaintext Secret Storage in Configuration Updates
scripts/setup_reminders.js:47Plaintext HTTP Holiday Service Controls Scheduled Reminder Decisions
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
A self-modifying capability that edits its own SKILL.md or metadata is dangerous because it can silently alter future behavior, triggers, and policy constraints, potentially bypassing review or expanding permissions over time. In agent environments, self-referential file modification is a strong persistence and tampering risk even if framed as benign maintenance.
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 创建台账:node scripts/init_table.js --open-id USER_OPEN_ID --lang zh|en,--open-id 必填
Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
- 录入任务:node scripts/add_task.js --task "名称" --priority "①" --deadline "2026-04-25" --lang zh|en,首次成功自动触发 cron