ClawHub
Back to skill

Security audit

quant-data-workbench

Security checks for vulnerabilities and agentic risk

Overview

This skill is a non-executable methodology guide for A-share quant data workflows and does not add code, credentials, persistence, or hidden behavior.

Installing this skill should mainly give your agent a Chinese-language methodology reference for quant data pipeline and backtesting work. Treat the external commercial tool link as a separate product to evaluate independently before purchase or installation, especially because it relates to financial research workflows.

A.I.G

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Skill Instruction HijackingAlters the agent's session goals or safety constraints when the skill loads
  • Agent Memory PoisoningWrites attacker-controlled rules into memory that affect later sessions
  • Remote Payload Retrieval and ExecutionFetches external code whose behavior can change after review
  • Embedded Malicious CodeShips malicious scripts inside the skill and executes them locally
  • Unauthorized Access and Privilege EscalationObtains permissions beyond the task's legitimate needs

SkillSpector

Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (1)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Category
Not specified by scanner
Confidence
86% confidence
Finding

The manifest says the skill should be used when the user asks "想做量化但卡在数据上", which is a broad conversational phrase rather than a tightly scoped invocation condition. The description does not provide exclusion conditions or negative examples, so the activation boundary is unclear and could cause unintended invocation for general quant-research discussions.

Content

No source excerpt is available for this finding.

Static analysis

No suspicious patterns detected.