HACCP食品安全合规护栏

Audit food safety plans, HACCP records, and inspection reports against Codex HACCP principles and ISO 22000 before release. Flags nonconforming hazard analyses, CCP limits, and verification records with fix suggestions.

HACCP Food Safety Guard

When to Use

Activate when reviewing, generating, or publishing any of:

• HACCP plans / food safety plans
• Hazard analysis documents
• Critical Control Point (CCP) monitoring records
• Corrective action records
• Verification / validation records
• Food inspection or audit reports
• Marketing claims about food safety certification

Core Rules

1. All 7 HACCP principles must be present (Codex CXC 1-1969). Missing any principle = nonconforming.
2. Every CCP must have a validated critical limit (Principle 3). No limit or unvalidated limit = critical.
3. Monitoring procedures must be defined for each CCP (Principle 4). Missing monitoring = critical.
4. Corrective actions must be pre-defined for each CCP (Principle 5). Missing corrective action = critical.
5. Hazard analysis must cover biological, chemical, physical, and allergen hazards. Omitting a hazard category = major.
6. Verification and validation are distinct (Principle 6). Confusing them or omitting verification = major.
7. Documentation and records must be maintained (Principle 7). Missing record-keeping procedure = major.

The 7 HACCP Principles (Codex Alimentarius)

#	Principle	Requirement
1	Hazard analysis	Identify hazards, assess significance, list control measures
2	Determine CCPs	Use CCP decision tree or equivalent logic
3	Establish critical limits	Measurable, validated limits for each CCP
4	Establish monitoring	What/how/frequency/who for each CCP
5	Establish corrective actions	Predefined actions when a deviation occurs
6	Establish verification	Confirm the HACCP system is working effectively
7	Establish documentation	Records of all procedures and principles

Common Nonconformities to Flag

Issue	Principle Violated	Severity
Hazard analysis missing allergen hazards	P1	Major
CCP without a critical limit	P3	Critical
Critical limit not validated	P3	Critical
No monitoring frequency defined	P4	Critical
No corrective action for a CCP	P5	Critical
Verification confused with monitoring	P6	Major
No record-keeping procedure	P7	Major
Decision tree not used for CCP determination	P2	Minor
"100% safe" / "zero risk" claims	Advertising rules	Minor

Terminology Corrections

Nonconforming Term	Correct Term	Basis
"sterile" (without validation)	"commercially sterile" / "pathogen-free"	Codex
"safe" (absolute)	"safe when handled/prepared as directed"	Codex
"CCP" for a non-control step	"Control Point" or "PRP"	ISO 22000
"quality control point" as CCP	Distinguish quality from safety CCP	HACCP

Output Format

text

【HACCP / Food Safety Compliance Review】

Document type: xxx
Review date: xxx
Standard: Codex CXC 1-1969 / ISO 22000

✅ Conformant items: x
⚠️ Observations: x (recommend improvement, not blocking)
❌ Nonconformities: x (must be corrected before release)

--- Nonconformities ---
[1] Issue description
  → Principle/clause violated: xxx
  → Suggested correction: xxx

--- Observations ---
[1] Issue description
  → Recommendation: xxx

【Conclusion】: PASS / FAIL (correct and re-review)

Usage

When the user submits a document for review, check it item-by-item against the rules above and produce the structured report.

• Critical nonconformities (❌) must block release.
• Observations (⚠️) get suggestions but do not block.

For detailed Codex guidance and ISO 22000 clause mapping, see references/haccp-codex.md.