LLC Name Generator

• Outcome: Review
• Latest audit: May 29, 2026 at 9:35 PM UTC
• Version:
  1.0.0

Overview

This is a simple local LLC name idea tool, but it presents unverified legal, state, domain, and trademark results as if they were real checks.

Use this only for brainstorming possible LLC names. Do not rely on its availability, trademark, domain, cost, or legal-compliance statements; verify directly with the relevant Secretary of State database, a domain registrar, USPTO resources, and qualified legal help before filing, reserving, or buying anything.

SkillSpector

By NVIDIA

Vulnerability Patterns

• Data Exfiltration: External Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
• MCP Tool Poisoning: Hidden Instructions, Unicode Deception, Parameter Description Injection
• Prompt Injection: Instruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
• Privilege Escalation: Excessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
• Supply Chain: Unpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code

Findings (9)

Intent-Code Divergence

Medium

• Confidence: 99% confidence
• Finding: The generated response asserts legal compliance and implies real validation even though the function only returns prewritten suggestions and fixed claims. In a business formation context, users may rely on incorrect naming and compliance guidance, leading to filing errors, wasted fees, or legal/trademark conflicts.

Intent-Code Divergence

High

• Confidence: 100% confidence
• Finding: The availability checker fabricates state, domain, and trademark results while presenting them as real status information. Because the skill is positioned as an operational LLC naming tool, users could make business decisions or purchases based on false availability data, creating direct financial and legal risk.

Intent-Code Divergence

High

• Confidence: 99% confidence
• Finding: The help text advertises capabilities such as checking all 50 states, domain/trademark analysis, and legal compliance assurance that are not implemented anywhere in the code. This materially misrepresents the skill's functionality and increases the likelihood that users will trust inaccurate outputs in a legal/compliance-sensitive workflow.

Intent-Code Divergence

Medium

• Confidence: 98% confidence
• Finding: The general marketing copy claims legal compliance checking, domain availability analysis, and trademark screening despite no supporting implementation. Even outside the specific checker flow, this broad misrepresentation can induce unwarranted trust and inappropriate reliance on the tool for compliance-sensitive decisions.

Missing User Warnings

Medium

• Confidence: 86% confidence
• Finding: The README advertises real-time availability, domain, and trademark checking but does not disclose that user-provided business names or queries may be sent to external services. This can mislead users about data handling and create privacy, confidentiality, or compliance risks, especially if proposed business names are sensitive pre-launch information.

Missing User Warnings

Medium

• Confidence: 96% confidence
• Finding: The response presents legal-compliance conclusions without warning that they are not authoritative or verified. In the context of LLC formation, omission of a limitation notice makes the misleading output more dangerous because users may treat it as professional or official guidance.

Missing User Warnings

Medium

• Confidence: 99% confidence
• Finding: The availability-check output provides simulated state, domain, and trademark statuses with no indication they are examples or placeholders. This is especially risky because the format resembles a real verification report and could cause users to file, reserve, or brand under unavailable or infringing names.

Missing User Warnings

Medium

• Confidence: 98% confidence
• Finding: The help text describes authoritative-sounding capabilities without disclosing limitations, which primes users to overtrust the tool. In a legal and business filing context, that omission can materially influence user decisions even before they see any specific result.

Missing User Warnings

Medium

• Confidence: 97% confidence
• Finding: The general description markets non-authoritative outputs as if they were actual legal, domain, and trademark checks, without any cautionary notice. Because the skill is framed as a business formation aid, the missing disclaimer increases the chance of harmful user reliance.

VirusTotal

66/66 vendors flagged this skill as clean.