Pro Code Reviewer

AdvisoryAudited by Static analysis on May 8, 2026.

Overview

No suspicious patterns detected.

Findings (0)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

The agent may inspect repository history, diffs, and matching source files in the current project.

Why it was flagged

The skill directs the agent to run local git commands with user-selected refs and to search the repository. This is central to code review, but it is still local command/tool use.

Skill content
"review <sha>" ... `git show <sha>`; "review branch <name>" ... `git diff main...<name>`; `git grep "<function_name>"`
Recommendation

Run it only in the intended repository, keep review scopes specific, and confirm unusual branch names, commit ranges, or very large diffs before proceeding.

What this means

If an HTML report is requested, the agent may run the included Python renderer and write a local report file.

Why it was flagged

The package includes a Python helper intended to render review JSON into an HTML file. This is optional and purpose-aligned, but it is executable local code.

Skill content
Usage:
    python3 render_report.py <input.json> <output.html>
Recommendation

Use the default chat/terminal report unless you want an HTML file, and review generated report paths before opening or sharing them.

What this means

Users cannot easily compare the submitted package to an upstream project or maintainer repository.

Why it was flagged

The registry metadata does not provide an upstream source or homepage for independent verification. The submitted artifacts themselves are coherent, but provenance is limited.

Skill content
Source: unknown
Homepage: none
Recommendation

Treat the packaged artifacts as the review basis, and prefer installing from a trusted publisher or verified repository when available.

What this means

Private source code, comments, and nearby implementation details may be processed by the agent during review.

Why it was flagged

The review workflow intentionally brings local source code and surrounding context into the agent's working context. This is expected for code review, but it may include private or sensitive project content.

Skill content
For each changed file ... Read the full function/method surrounding each change ... search for callers: `git grep "<function_name>"`
Recommendation

Avoid running it on repositories containing secrets or highly sensitive code unless your agent environment is approved for that data.