Mao Emperors
ReviewAudited by ClawScan on May 10, 2026.
Overview
Prompt-injection indicators were detected in the submitted artifacts (unicode-control-chars); human review is required before treating this skill as clean.
This skill appears safe as an instruction-only brainstorming and decision-support persona. Verify the source if provenance matters, treat its political/historical framing as style rather than authority, and do not let any separately paired coding or research agent take real actions without your review. ClawScan detected prompt-injection indicators (unicode-control-chars), so this skill requires review even though the model response was benign.
Findings (2)
Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.
You may not be able to confirm the maintainer or source history, but the provided package does not install or run code.
The repository is a placeholder, so users cannot verify source provenance from the artifact. Because there is no executable code or install step, this is a provenance note rather than a behavior concern.
"repository": "https://github.com/your-username/openclaw-skills"
Treat the source link as unverified and review the skill text before relying on it; prefer a real, auditable repository for future versions.
If you combine this skill with action-capable skills, its recommendations could be followed by real code or workflow changes.
The documentation suggests optional pairing with a separate coding agent. That could turn planning advice into code-changing actions if the user chooses the combination, although this skill itself exposes no tools.
帝王会议 + coding-agent - 决策后直接执行代码开发
Use this skill as planning input and require explicit user review before any other skill modifies files, code, accounts, or workflows.