龙虾量化研究公司

PassAudited by ClawScan on May 1, 2026.

Overview

This is an instruction-only multi-agent role template for quant research and content work; it has no code or credential access, but users should supervise any real trading, deployment, data-source, or public-content steps.

This skill appears safe as an instruction-only role framework. Before installing or using it for real work, keep human approval for trading, deployment, and publishing; verify any external market-data tools such as sxsc-tushare; and be transparent when publishing AI-assisted content.

Findings (3)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

A user may later be asked to connect or install an external data source that was not reviewed in this artifact set.

Why it was flagged

The skill relies on a named external data/tool source and references TOOLS.md, but that file is not included in the provided artifacts. This is not malicious by itself, but users cannot review the referenced setup or provenance here.

Skill content
A股回测: 必须使用 sxsc-tushare 真实数据(见 TOOLS.md)
Recommendation

Before using sxsc-tushare or any referenced market-data tooling, review its documentation, required credentials, permissions, and data-handling behavior.

What this means

If connected to real trading, deployment, or account tools in the future, automated workflow language could lead to actions with financial or operational consequences.

Why it was flagged

The standard workflow includes strategy development and '测试上线'. Although no tools or commands are provided, the wording could encourage an agent to proceed through high-impact research-to-deployment steps unless the user keeps approval boundaries clear.

Skill content
量化任务:[描述] — 自动走标准研发流程
Recommendation

Use this skill as advisory unless you explicitly approve each real data connection, deployment, trading action, or production change.

What this means

Readers could be misled about AI involvement if humanized AI-generated content is published without appropriate transparency.

Why it was flagged

The content workflow includes making AI-written articles appear more human. This can be legitimate editing, but it may also affect transparency if used for public publication without disclosure.

Skill content
"name": "去AI化助手", "role": "对写手产出的文章进行润色,增加人情味、口语化表达,去除AI味,让文章更有温度"
Recommendation

Use the writing workflow responsibly and follow any platform, legal, or organizational disclosure requirements for AI-assisted content.