Strict Self-Improving Agent (Rule of 3)

Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude ('No, that's wrong...', 'Actually...'), (3) User requests a capability that doesn't exist, (4) An external API or tool fails, (5) Claude realizes its knowledge is outdated or incorrect, (6) A better approach is discovered for a recurring task. Also review learnings before major tasks.

🦾 Self-Improving Agent (Strict Promotion Protocol)

"Stop letting your AI agent pollute its own core instructions based on subjective feelings."

This is an industrial-grade, closed-loop Self-Improvement System for OpenClaw. It replaces the default subjective "agent feelings" with a rigid, quantitative pipeline: The Rule of 3.

Instead of bloating your SOUL.md or AGENTS.md with every random bug the agent encounters, this skill forces the agent to merely log errors as pending. Only when an error recurs 3 times (linked via See Also) is it eligible for promotion.

Includes a built-in bash script (promote-review.sh) to aggregate pending promotions for human approval.

🌟 Why install this?

1. Zero Context Bloat: Keeps your SOUL.md and 200K window pristine.
2. Rule of 3 (Quantitative Trigger): Issues must happen 3 times before they can be considered a "Rule".
3. Strict Domain Governance: Mutually exclusive rules for what goes into SOUL (behavior), AGENTS (workflow), and TOOLS (CLI gotchas).
4. Human-in-the-Loop Review: Batch processing of promotions via a weekly aggregator script.

---

🚀 Quick Setup (OpenClaw)

This skill is designed natively for the OpenClaw architecture.

Via ClawdHub CLI (1-Click Install):

clawhub install self-improving-agent

Workspace Structure

OpenClaw injects these files into every session:

~/.openclaw/workspace/
├── AGENTS.md          # Multi-agent workflows, delegation patterns
├── SOUL.md            # Behavioral guidelines, personality, principles
├── TOOLS.md           # Tool capabilities, integration gotchas
├── MEMORY.md          # Long-term memory (main session only)
├── memory/            # Memory System (v4.0)
│   ├── daily_raw/
│   ├── summaries/
│   ├── projects/
│   └── core/          # This skill's log files
│       ├── learning.md
│       ├── error.md
│       └── features.md

Create Learning Files

mkdir -p ~/.openclaw/workspace/memory/core

Then create the log files (or copy from assets/):

• learning.md — corrections, knowledge gaps, best practices
• error.md — command failures, exceptions
• features.md — user-requested capabilities

Promotion Targets

When learnings prove broadly applicable, promote them to workspace files:

Learning Type	Promote To	Example
Behavioral patterns	SOUL.md	"Be concise, avoid disclaimers"
Workflow improvements	AGENTS.md	"Spawn sub-agents for long tasks"
Tool gotchas	TOOLS.md	"Git push needs auth configured first"

Inter-Session Communication

OpenClaw provides tools to share learnings across sessions:

• sessions_list — View active/recent sessions
• sessions_history — Read another session's transcript
• sessions_send — Send a learning to another session
• sessions_spawn — Spawn a sub-agent for background work

Optional: Enable Hook

For automatic reminders at session start:

# Copy hook to OpenClaw hooks directory
cp -r hooks/openclaw ~/.openclaw/hooks/self-improvement

# Enable it
openclaw hooks enable self-improvement

See references/openclaw-integration.md for complete details.

---

Generic Setup (Other Agents)

For Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, or other agents, create memory/core/ in your project:

mkdir -p memory/core

Copy templates from assets/ or create files with headers.

Logging Format

Learning Entry

Append to memory/core/learning.md:

## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: low | medium | high | critical
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
One-line description of what was learned

### Details
Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct

### Suggested Action
Specific fix or improvement to make

### Metadata
- Source: conversation | error | user_feedback
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- Tags: tag1, tag2
- See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)

---

Error Entry

Append to memory/core/error.md:

## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: high
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary
Brief description of what failed

### Error

Actual error message or output

### Context
- Command/operation attempted
- Input or parameters used
- Environment details if relevant

### Suggested Fix
If identifiable, what might resolve this

### Metadata
- Reproducible: yes | no | unknown
- Related Files: path/to/file.ext
- See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)

---

Feature Request Entry

Append to memory/core/features.md:

## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp
**Priority**: medium
**Status**: pending
**Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Requested Capability
What the user wanted to do

### User Context
Why they needed it, what problem they're solving

### Complexity Estimate
simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation
How this could be built, what it might extend

### Metadata
- Frequency: first_time | recurring
- Related Features: existing_feature_name

---

ID Generation

Format: TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX

• TYPE: LRN (learning), ERR (error), FEAT (feature)
• YYYYMMDD: Current date
• XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., 001, A7B)

Examples: LRN-20250115-001, ERR-20250115-A3F, FEAT-20250115-002

Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

1. Change **Status**: pending → **Status**: resolved
2. Add resolution block after Metadata:

### Resolution
- **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z
- **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42
- **Notes**: Brief description of what was done

Other status values:

• in_progress - Actively being worked on
• wont_fix - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes)
• promoted - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

严格晋升机制 (Strict Promotion Protocol)

CRITICAL RULE: The main agent is explicitly FORBIDDEN from writing directly to SOUL.md, AGENTS.md, or TOOLS.md during normal tasks. All new knowledge must be recorded in memory/core/*.md first.

When to Trigger Promotion (Rule of 3)

We utilize a strict quantitative counter rather than subjective feelings.

1. Log the Issue: If an issue occurs, log it to memory/core/ (status: pending).
2. Search Historical Logs: ALWAYS search memory/core/ for similar past issues using grep.
3. Trigger Threshold: ONLY if the current issue links to 3 or more existing entries via **See Also**, you MUST change the status of the current entry to **Status**: ready_for_promotion.
4. Wait for Review: Do not write to workspace files. Leave it as ready_for_promotion for the weekly human review pipeline.

Strict Domain Separation (Target Governance)

If the weekly review script approves a promotion, it must strictly follow these mutually exclusive rules:

Target	Absolute Membership Criteria
SOUL.md	Strictly behavioral. Only modify if changing the agent's core persona, communication tone, or adding global un-overrideable safety bans (e.g., "NEVER use cat to modify files").
AGENTS.md	Strictly workflow orchestration. Only modify if detailing the mandatory sequence of operations (e.g., "always clear cache before building") or sub-agent delegation chains.
TOOLS.md	Strictly 3rd-party tool quirks. Only modify if documenting a specific bug or required flag for an external CLI or API (e.g., "jq requires -r for raw output").
skills/ Dir	Strictly multi-step autonomous logic. If an issue requires 3+ steps to reliably fix (such as a full diagnosis script), DO NOT put it in SOUL/AGENTS. Run the extract-skill.sh script and make it a dedicated Skill.

Promotion Examples

Learning (Accumulated 3+ times):

Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted npm install but failed 3 times across sessions.

In AGENTS.md (After human approved ready_for_promotion):

## Build Protocol
- MANDATORY: Use `pnpm install`, NOT npm, for workspace root syncing.

Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

1. Search first: grep -r "keyword" memory/core/
2. Link entries: Add **See Also**: ERR-20250110-001 in Metadata
3. Bump priority if issue keeps recurring
4. Consider systemic fix: Recurring issues often indicate:
   • Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md)
   • Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md)
   • Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)

Periodic Review

Review memory/core/ at natural breakpoints:

When to Review

• Before starting a new major task
• After completing a feature
• When working in an area with past learnings
• Weekly during active development

Quick Status Check

# Count pending items
grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" memory/core/*.md | wc -l

# List pending high-priority items
grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" memory/core/*.md | grep "^## \["

# Find learnings for a specific area
grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" memory/core/*.md

Review Actions

• Resolve fixed items
• Promote applicable learnings
• Link related entries
• Escalate recurring issues

Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you notice:

Corrections (→ learning with correction category):

• "No, that's not right..."
• "Actually, it should be..."
• "You're wrong about..."
• "That's outdated..."

Feature Requests (→ feature request):

• "Can you also..."
• "I wish you could..."
• "Is there a way to..."
• "Why can't you..."

Knowledge Gaps (→ learning with knowledge_gap category):

• User provides information you didn't know
• Documentation you referenced is outdated
• API behavior differs from your understanding

Errors (→ error entry):

• Command returns non-zero exit code
• Exception or stack trace
• Unexpected output or behavior
• Timeout or connection failure

Priority Guidelines

Priority	When to Use
critical	Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue
high	Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue
medium	Moderate impact, workaround exists
low	Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have

Area Tags

Use to filter learnings by codebase region:

Area	Scope
frontend	UI, components, client-side code
backend	API, services, server-side code
infra	CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud
tests	Test files, testing utilities, coverage
docs	Documentation, comments, READMEs
config	Configuration files, environment, settings

Best Practices

1. Log immediately - context is freshest right after the issue
2. Be specific - future agents need to understand quickly
3. Include reproduction steps - especially for errors
4. Link related files - makes fixes easier
5. Suggest concrete fixes - not just "investigate"
6. Use consistent categories - enables filtering
7. Promote aggressively - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md
8. Review regularly - stale learnings lose value

Gitignore Options

Keep learnings local (per-developer):

memory/core/

Track learnings in repo (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge.

Hybrid (track templates, ignore entries):

memory/core/*.md
!memory/core/memory-system-design.md

Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is opt-in - you must explicitly configure hooks.

Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create .claude/settings.json in your project:

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

This injects a learning evaluation reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead).

Full Setup (With Error Detection)

{
  "hooks": {
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{
      "matcher": "",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh"
      }]
    }],
    "PostToolUse": [{
      "matcher": "Bash",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh"
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Available Hook Scripts

Script	Hook Type	Purpose
scripts/activator.sh	UserPromptSubmit	Reminds to evaluate learnings after tasks
scripts/error-detector.sh	PostToolUse (Bash)	Triggers on command errors

See references/hooks-setup.md for detailed configuration and troubleshooting.

Automatic Skill Extraction

When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper.

Skill Extraction Criteria

A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply:

Criterion	Description
Recurring	Has See Also links to 2+ similar issues
Verified	Status is resolved with working fix
Non-obvious	Required actual debugging/investigation to discover
Broadly applicable	Not project-specific; useful across codebases
User-flagged	User says "save this as a skill" or similar

Extraction Workflow

1. Identify candidate: Learning meets extraction criteria
2. Run helper (or create manually):

   ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run
   ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name
   

3. Customize SKILL.md: Fill in template with learning content
4. Update learning: Set status to promoted_to_skill, add Skill-Path
5. Verify: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained

Manual Extraction

If you prefer manual creation:

1. Create skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
2. Use template from assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md
3. Follow Agent Skills spec:
   • YAML frontmatter with name and description
   • Name must match folder name
   • No README.md inside skill folder

Extraction Detection Triggers

Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill:

In conversation:

• "Save this as a skill"
• "I keep running into this"
• "This would be useful for other projects"
• "Remember this pattern"

In learning entries:

• Multiple See Also links (recurring issue)
• High priority + resolved status
• Category: best_practice with broad applicability
• User feedback praising the solution

Skill Quality Gates

Before extraction, verify:

• Solution is tested and working
• Description is clear without original context
• Code examples are self-contained
• No project-specific hardcoded values
• Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens)

Multi-Agent Support

This skill works across different AI coding agents with agent-specific activation.

Claude Code

Activation: Hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse) Setup: .claude/settings.json with hook configuration Detection: Automatic via hook scripts

Codex CLI

Activation: Hooks (same pattern as Claude Code) Setup: .codex/settings.json with hook configuration Detection: Automatic via hook scripts

GitHub Copilot

Activation: Manual (no hook support) Setup: Add to .github/copilot-instructions.md:

## Self-Improvement

After solving non-obvious issues, consider logging to `memory/core/`:
1. Use format from self-improvement skill
2. Link related entries with See Also
3. Promote high-value learnings to skills

Ask in chat: "Should I log this as a learning?"

Detection: Manual review at session end

OpenClaw

Activation: Workspace injection + inter-agent messaging Setup: See "OpenClaw Setup" section above Detection: Via session tools and workspace files

Agent-Agnostic Guidance

Regardless of agent, apply self-improvement when you:

1. Discover something non-obvious - solution wasn't immediate
2. Correct yourself - initial approach was wrong
3. Learn project conventions - discovered undocumented patterns
4. Hit unexpected errors - especially if diagnosis was difficult
5. Find better approaches - improved on your original solution

Copilot Chat Integration

For Copilot users, add this to your prompts when relevant:

After completing this task, evaluate if any learnings should be logged to memory/core/ using the self-improvement skill format.

Or use quick prompts:

• "Log this to learnings"
• "Create a skill from this solution"
• "Check memory/core/ for related issues"