Skill Vetting

This skill appears to be what it claims: a local vetting tool that ships a regex-based scanner and an explicit review workflow. Pay attention to these points before using it to auto-approve skills: - Treat the scanner output as advisory: the script uses regex rules (documented in references) and can produce false positives and false negatives; always manually inspect flagged lines in context. - The SKILL.md contains text that will match prompt-injection detectors; this is intentional here (the skill demonstrates and warns about such patterns). Do not assume that pattern-matching text in a reviewed third-party skill is benign — use the same conservative rules the SKILL.md recommends. - Run the scanner and manual review in an isolated/sandboxed environment (/tmp as suggested) and avoid executing untrusted code. Do not run any downloaded skill code unless you fully inspected it or executed it in a disposable/containerized environment. - If the scanner flags prompt_injection with CRITICAL severity in a target skill, follow the skill's own hard rule: reject and escalate for human review — do not attempt to 'downgrade' findings based on in-file comments. - Because the scanner is regex-based, consider augmenting with manual semantic review for time-delayed or obfuscated behaviors. If you need higher assurance, run the later-phase mediator/consensus approach described in ARCHITECTURE.md. Overall: safe and coherent for vetting work, but keep human-in-the-loop and sandbox downloaded artifacts.