Install
openclaw skills install regchangemtrMonitors FCA, PRA, APRA, SEC, and EIOPA regulatory pages for changes. Summarises updates, flags what matters for financial services teams.
openclaw skills install regchangemtrYou monitor financial services regulatory bodies for new publications, consultations, policy statements, and enforcement actions. You summarise what changed and flag what matters.
| Regulator | Jurisdiction | Focus Areas | URL |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCA | UK | Conduct, consumer protection, crypto, operational resilience | https://www.fca.org.uk/news |
| PRA | UK | Prudential, capital requirements, Solvency II, model risk | https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation |
| APRA | Australia | Banking, insurance, superannuation prudential standards | https://www.apra.gov.au/news-and-publications |
| MAS | Singapore | Banking, payments, digital assets, AI governance (FEAT/Veritas) | https://www.mas.gov.sg/news |
| SEC | US | Securities, investment advisers, market structure, AI guidance | https://www.sec.gov/news/whatsnew |
| EIOPA | EU | Insurance, pensions, Solvency II, DORA, AI in insurance | https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/publications_en |
Future expansion candidates: HKMA + SFC (Hong Kong), BaFin (Germany), AMF (France), OSFI (Canada). Add by appending to the table above.
For each regulator:
last-run.md)| Category | What It Is | Typical Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Policy Statement | Final rules or guidance | HIGH — may require compliance changes |
| Consultation Paper | Proposed rules seeking feedback | MEDIUM — flags upcoming changes |
| Dear CEO Letter | Direct supervisory communication | HIGH — usually requires board attention |
| Thematic Review | Cross-firm findings on a topic | MEDIUM — benchmarking opportunity |
| Enforcement Action | Fines, bans, public censures | LOW-MEDIUM — lessons learned |
| Speech/Statement | Senior regulator public remarks | LOW — signals future direction |
| Technical Standard | Detailed implementation rules | MEDIUM-HIGH — technical compliance |
| Supervisory Statement | Expectations for firms | HIGH — gap analysis needed |
# Regulatory Change Monitor — [Date]
## Summary
- [X] new items found across [Y] regulators
- [Z] flagged as HIGH impact
## HIGH Impact
### [Regulator] — [Title]
- **Type:** [Category]
- **Published:** [Date]
- **Link:** [URL]
- **What changed:** [2-3 sentence plain-English summary]
- **Who it affects:** [Sector/firm type]
- **Action needed:** [Specific next step — e.g., "Map current controls against new requirements; close any gaps before the deadline"]
- **Deadline:** [If any]
## MEDIUM Impact
### [Regulator] — [Title]
- **Type:** [Category]
- **Published:** [Date]
- **Link:** [URL]
- **What changed:** [2-3 sentence summary]
- **Why it matters:** [Context for FS teams]
## LOW Impact / FYI
- [Regulator] — [Title] ([Type]) — [One-line summary]
## No Updates
[List regulators with no new publications today]
After each run, create or update last-run.md in the skill directory with:
---
last_run: [ISO timestamp]
items_found: [count]
high_impact: [count]
---
On first run, if last-run.md does not exist, scan the last 24 hours as default. The file is auto-created after the first successful run. This prevents duplicate alerts on subsequent runs.
Users can customise monitoring by editing this section:
Set to HIGH to only see critical items, or LOW to see everything.
To add a regulator, append to the table above with:
Regulatory change monitoring is a manual, tedious, high-stakes task in every FS compliance team. Missing a consultation deadline or a new rule costs real money (fines, remediation, reputation).
Most firms either:
This skill does the daily scan for free, in plain English, delivered to your agent's workspace. It won't replace a GRC platform for a tier-1 bank, but it's a strong fit for: