Long Research

[BETA] Deep research that actually reads pages instead of summarizing search results. Tell it how long to research (10 min, 2 hours, all night) and it works the full duration — searching, reading every result, following leads, cracking forums, cross-verifying findings, and writing progressively to a research file. Tree-style exploration: each page read spawns new searches, like a human researcher. Enforced read-to-search ratio prevents shallow search-spamming. Wall-clock time commitment — it won't finish early. Self-audit gate blocks delivery until quality checks pass. Works with web_search, web_fetch, and browser-use for JS-heavy sites.

Audits

Suspicious

ClawScanSuspicious

Agentic behavior and permission review.

Static analysisPending

Pattern checks against bundled files.

VirusTotalPass

Multi-engine malware detections and file reputation.

Install

openclaw skills install long-research

Long Research

⚠️ BETA — This skill works as described but is under active development. Review the notes below before installing.

Dependencies

web_search — any search provider (Perplexity Sonar, Brave, etc.)
web_fetch — built into most agent frameworks
browser-use (REQUIRED) — install via pip install browser-use && browser-use install. Used for JS-heavy sites, login-gated forums, and retailer pricing. The skill will not function fully without it.

Privacy & Trust Notes

browser-use remote mode: The browser-use cascade tries 3 modes in order: chromium (local, free) → real (local, free) → remote (cloud-hosted, burns API credits). Remote mode sends page content to browser-use.com's cloud infrastructure. If you care about privacy, you can:

Remove remote from the cascade and only use local modes
Run in Interactive mode so the agent asks before escalating to remote
The skill works fine with local-only browser modes for most sites

Login-gated forums and browser profiles: The skill includes patterns for extracting content from login-gated forums using --profile flags. Profiles persist cookies locally on your machine in browser-use's default profile directory. The agent does NOT attempt automated login — it uses browser-use's cookie persistence from previous manual sessions. If you haven't logged into a forum manually via browser-use before, the agent won't have access. No credentials are stored or transmitted by this skill.

Filesystem writes: Research output is written to research/[topic]-[date].md in your agent's working directory. Progressive writes happen every 3-5 tool calls as crash recovery. Files stay on your local machine — nothing is uploaded. If running in a shared environment, configure your agent's working directory to a safe location.

Sub-agent prompt injection surface: The skill mandates pasting full instructions into sub-agent task prompts. This means the entire SKILL.md (including your research query) is sent to whatever model provider your sub-agent uses. If you use external/remote model providers, be aware that your research queries and the full skill text are transmitted to those services. This is standard for any agent skill that delegates to sub-agents — but worth noting if your research topics are sensitive.

Recommended for first-time users:

Run in Interactive mode (not Autonomous) until you're comfortable with the skill's behavior
Start with a short duration (10 min) to see how it works
Review the research file output before trusting findings

Activation

When the user invokes this skill (e.g. "do long research", "research X", "pull up long research"), immediately start the pre-flight checklist. Do NOT ask "what topic?" separately — go straight into the pre-flight questions. If the user already provided a topic in their message, pre-fill it and ask the remaining questions.

Pre-Flight Checklist (MANDATORY — NO EXCEPTIONS)

Before starting ANY research, confirm all of these with the user:

Topic — What exactly to research. Get specific. If not provided yet, ask now.
Duration — How long to spend. Minimum 10 minutes, can be hours.
Autonomy — Choose one. Default: Autonomous.
- Autonomous — No questions, log everything, report at end.
- Interactive — May ask clarifying questions during research. Pauses for answers.
- Interactive-continue — May ask clarifying questions, but if user doesn't reply within ~2 minutes, continue research with best judgment. Never block on silence.
Tools — List in priority order (highest priority first). The plan block MUST reflect this ordering. Default priority:
1. web_search — discovery, overviews, forum consensus
2. web_fetch — reading specific review/forum/article pages
3. browser-use (REQUIRED dependency) — retailer pricing (Amazon, etc.), JS-heavy sites, anything web_fetch can't reach. See references/browser-use-patterns.md
User may reorder (e.g., browser-use first for pricing-heavy research). Always include all three in the plan block — never omit browser-use.
Scheduling — Now or delayed? If delayed, note time + timezone.
Output — Where to deliver (this chat, specific topic, file only) and format (summary, full report, comparison table).
Clarifying questions — Ask anything about the user's situation BEFORE starting. Don't assume hardware, location, budget, preferences, etc.

⛔ GATE: You MUST post the plan block below and receive explicit user approval before making ANY research tool calls. Do not start research based on implied approval, partial answers, or "just get going" energy. The plan block IS the gate.

Post this and wait for approval:

📋 Research Plan
• Topic: [what]
• Duration: [X] minutes/hours
• Mode: Autonomous / Interactive / Interactive-continue
• Tools: [list in priority order, e.g. web_search → web_fetch → browser-use]
• Start: Now / [scheduled time]
• Output: [where and format]
• Questions: [anything unclear about user's situation]

Proceed? (yes to start)

If the user answers clarifying questions but doesn't say "proceed/yes/go", re-post the updated plan and ask again.

Spawning (CRITICAL — read this before delegating to a sub-agent)

⛔ The sub-agent MUST have the full skill instructions in its task prompt. The root cause of most research failures is the orchestrator paraphrasing the skill instead of injecting it. A sub-agent that doesn't read this file will ignore every gate, every ratio, every enforcement rule.

How to spawn a research sub-agent:

Read this entire SKILL.md into context (you're already doing this if you're reading this).
Construct the task prompt with these MANDATORY sections in this order:

TASK PROMPT TEMPLATE (paste in this order — critical rules at TOP and BOTTOM):
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## ⛔ CRITICAL RULES (read first, enforce always)
1. READ > SEARCH. After Seed, you cannot search unless you've read something since your last search.
2. NEVER start synthesis while time remains. Run `date +%s` and check END_TS.
3. browser-use cascade: chromium → real → remote. Try ALL 3 before giving up on any source.
4. web_search returns URLS, not answers. Ignore Perplexity's synthesis text. Extract only the citation URLs.
5. "Not found" IS a valid finding. If you can't find what was asked, say so honestly. Do NOT answer an adjacent question.

## Research Task
[The user's EXACT question, quoted verbatim. Do not paraphrase, soften, or broaden it.]

## Task Anchor (re-read every 5 tool calls)
Your job is to answer THIS question: "[exact question again]"
Every 5 tool calls, ask yourself: "Does my last action directly serve THIS question?"
If no → STOP current branch → re-orient.

## User Context
[Any relevant context — location, timeline, constraints. Keep separate from the task.]

## Research Rules
[Paste the FULL Execution section from SKILL.md — the complete Read-Driven Loop,
browser-use Cascade, Forum-Cracking Playbook, Progressive Writing, Time Enforcement,
Negative Results, Self-Audit, etc.]

## ⛔ REMINDER (read last, enforce always)
- You MUST read more pages than you search. Track: reads vs searches.
- You MUST try all 3 browser modes before giving up.
- You MUST NOT start synthesis while time remains.
- You MUST deliver honest negative results, not drift to adjacent questions.
- You MUST run the self-audit before delivering.
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Never summarize the rules. Paste them. The sub-agent needs the actual enforcement language.
Quote the user's question verbatim in both Task and Task Anchor. Do not rephrase "find real life experience where X happened" into "research whether X is common."
Put critical rules at both TOP and BOTTOM of the prompt — primacy and recency effects in attention mean middle sections get ignored.

Common spawning mistakes:

❌ "Research X for 10 minutes following the long-research skill" — the sub-agent doesn't have the skill
❌ Paraphrasing the question — changes what the agent optimizes for
❌ Adding your own interpretation — "Focus on category A" when user said "any category"
❌ Omitting browser-use cascade details — agent won't know to retry
❌ Rules only in the middle of a long prompt — agent attention drops off
✅ Critical rules at top AND bottom + full rules in middle + exact question quoted

Execution

Where to Run

Dedicated topic or sub-agent — never in main session
Sub-agent for fully autonomous tasks
Dedicated topic if interactive (so user can engage)

The Read-Driven Loop (replaces the old "Execution Flow")

The fundamental architecture: reading pages is the default action. Searching is only allowed when the URL queue is empty. This prevents the search-addiction pattern where agents fire 15 searches and read 3 pages.

1. SETUP
   ├─ START_TS=$(date +%s)
   ├─ END_TS=$((START_TS + DURATION_SECONDS))
   ├─ SEARCH_COUNT=0, READ_COUNT=0, WRITE_COUNT=0
   ├─ Create URL_QUEUE (empty list)
   └─ Post: "🚀 Research started. Deadline: $(date -d @$END_TS '+%H:%M:%S')"

2. SURVEY PHASE (first 30% of committed time — BREADTH before depth)
   ├─ Goal: IDENTIFY as many candidates/angles as possible. Do NOT deep-dive yet.
   ├─ Run 3-5 broad searches with different angles/terminology
   ├─ For each search: extract citation URLs + candidate names/items mentioned
   ├─ Build a CANDIDATE LIST: every distinct option/entity mentioned across all sources
   ├─ ⛔ GATE: Write #1 to file (Task Anchor + FULL candidate list + URL queue)
   ├─ CANDIDATE GATE: You MUST have identified ≥10 candidates before deep-diving ANY of them.
   │   If topic naturally has fewer (e.g., "best 3 X"), adjust to ≥2x the expected answer count.
   ├─ WRITE_COUNT += 1
   └─ Post: "📋 Survey complete. [N] candidates identified: [list]. Now deep-diving."
   
   Example: Don't stop at the first 3 options you find. If researching [Topic], survey should
   uncover at least 10-20 candidates across different categories, brands, or approaches.
   THEN prioritize which to deep-dive based on relevance to the question.

3. MAIN LOOP (repeat until time runs out)
   │
   ├─ IF URL_QUEUE is not empty:
   │   ├─ Pop next URL from queue
   │   ├─ RELEVANCE CHECK: Is this URL likely to contain what the Task Anchor asks for?
   │   │   If clearly irrelevant (e.g., beginner guide when searching for expert anecdotes): SKIP, log as "pruned: [reason]"
   │   ├─ READ it (web_fetch first, browser-use cascade if fails)
   │   ├─ After reading, assess: "Did this page help answer the Task Anchor?" 
   │   │   If yes: READ_COUNT += 1 (productive read)
   │   │   If no: DEAD_END_COUNT += 1 (log as dead end, don't count as productive)
   │   ├─ Extract: findings + new URLs → add new URLs to queue
   │   ├─ If read spawns a question that needs a NEW search:
   │   │   └─ ALLOWED (because you just read something)
   │   │       ├─ web_search → extract citation URLs → add to queue
   │   │       └─ SEARCH_COUNT += 1
   │   └─ Continue to next iteration
   │
   ├─ IF URL_QUEUE is empty AND you need more:
   │   ├─ web_search with NEW terms (not repeating old queries)
   │   ├─ SEARCH_COUNT += 1
   │   ├─ Extract URLs → add to queue
   │   └─ Go back to reading from queue
   │
   ├─ Every 3-5 tool calls: write findings to file, WRITE_COUNT += 1
   │
   ├─ Every 5 tool calls: 
   │   ├─ Re-read Task Anchor — am I still on-target?
   │   ├─ Run: NOW=$(date +%s); REMAINING=$((END_TS - NOW))
   │   ├─ Post: ⏱️ elapsed/committed (remaining) | 🔍 S | 📄 R | 📝 W | 🪦 D (dead ends) | R>S? yes/no
   │   └─ Verify: READ_COUNT > SEARCH_COUNT? If not, STOP searching, READ.
   │
   ├─ ⛔ BROWSER-USE DEADLINE: By 50% of committed time, you MUST have attempted
   │   at least 1 browser-use call. If you reach the halfway mark without one,
   │   STOP everything and run a browser-use cascade on your most promising blocked URL.
   │
   ├─ ⛔ NO IDLE WAITING — NEVER USE `sleep` EXCEPT FOR browser-use PAGE LOADS (max 3s):
   │   If you have time remaining, you MUST be making productive tool calls.
   │   Running `sleep 60` or any sleep > 3s to fill time is a HARD FAIL.
   │   
   │   Before you even think about sleeping, run this MANDATORY checklist:
   │   □ Have I tried the top 3 forums for this domain?
   │   □ Have I tried old.reddit.com web_fetch on at least 1 subreddit?
   │   □ Have I tried Google cache on at least 1 blocked URL?
   │   □ Have I searched YouTube comments?
   │   □ Have I searched in non-English languages (if relevant)?
   │   □ Have I tried older threads (2020, 2021, 2022)?
   │   □ Have I tried alternative community forums beyond the obvious ones?
   │   □ Have I cross-verified my existing findings with a second source?
   │   If ANY box is unchecked → DO THAT instead of sleeping.
   │
   └─ TIME CHECK: if $(date +%s) >= END_TS → exit loop, go to SYNTHESIS

4. SYNTHESIS (only after time is up)
   ├─ ⛔ GATE: Run date +%s. Print result. If NOW < END_TS, go back to step 3.
   ├─ Write final version of research file
   ├─ Include: Task Anchor, Executive Summary, Research Tree, Findings, Sources, Verification
   └─ WRITE_COUNT += 1

5. SELF-AUDIT (hard gate — blocks delivery)
   ├─ Run every checklist item (see Self-Audit section below)
   ├─ Fix any failures
   └─ Write Process Compliance section

6. DELIVER
   ├─ Chat summary (<500 words)
   ├─ Link to research file
   └─ Final elapsed time from date +%s

Why this works better than a ratio rule:

The ratio is architecturally enforced: you can only search when the queue is empty OR after completing a read.
Searching is the exception, reading is the default.
The agent can't chain 5 searches in a row because the loop structure doesn't allow it.
The READ_COUNT > SEARCH_COUNT check every 5 calls catches any drift.

The Search Discipline

web_search returns URLs, not answers.

When web_search returns a response from Perplexity/Sonar:

Extract ONLY the citation URLs from the response.
Add those URLs to your queue.
Ignore the synthesized text. Do not read it. Do not cite it. Do not base any finding on it.

Why: Perplexity fabricates quotes, hallucinates thread URLs, and presents unverified claims as consensus. If you read its synthesis, you'll unconsciously treat it as a finding. Don't read it. URLs only.

After Seed phase, you earn each search by reading:

✅ READ → SEARCH → READ → SEARCH (alternating)
✅ READ → READ → READ → SEARCH (reading more is always fine)
❌ SEARCH → SEARCH (never, unless in Seed)
❌ SEARCH → SEARCH → READ (too late, you already chained)

Hard search cap: Maximum searches = 1.5x committed minutes. For 10 min = max 15 searches. If you hit the cap, you are BLOCKED from searching for the rest of the session. Read only. At any checkpoint: if SEARCH_COUNT > 2x READ_COUNT → BLOCKED from searching until reads catch up.

PDF URLs: If a URL ends in .pdf, use browser-use to render it. web_fetch returns binary garbage for PDFs. Skip PDFs entirely if browser-use is unavailable.

Source Balance: User Reports vs Official Research (MANDATORY)

For grey-area topics (supplements, nootropics, off-label treatments, emerging tech, anything without large studies or established consensus):

User reports ARE the data. The person on a forum who's been using a product for 6 months IS a primary source.
Hard rule: ≥40% of productive reads must be forum/user-report sources (not academic papers, not marketing sites, not review articles).
Track: FORUM_READ_COUNT separately from STUDY_READ_COUNT.
At every 5-call checkpoint: Forum reads / Total reads >= 0.4? If not → next reads MUST be forums.
Forums to prioritize: Reddit (relevant subreddits), StackExchange, specialized community forums for the topic, niche discussion boards, practitioner blogs with comment sections

For well-studied topics (established science, mainstream products):

Official research takes priority. Forum reads still valuable but ratio can be 30/70.

Adversarial Thinking (MANDATORY — prevents confirmation bias)

For EVERY candidate/option the research identifies as "good" or "recommended":

Search for the negative case. Literally search: "[candidate] dangers" OR "[candidate] problems" OR "[candidate] risks" OR "[candidate] didn't work"
Follow the mechanism chain. If something works by mechanism X, ask: "What ELSE does mechanism X do? Could it cause harm?"
- Example: If X promotes growth/healing via mechanism Y → Does Y also have unwanted side effects? Search it.
- Example: If X improves metric A → Does it also worsen metric B? Search it.
- Example: If X suppresses process P → Does that suppression cause downstream problems? Search it.
Devil's advocate search quota: At least 1 adversarial search per 3 candidates identified. If you found 9 options, you need ≥3 "what could go wrong" searches.
Write a "Risks & Concerns" section that is at LEAST 25% the length of the "Benefits" section. If your benefits section is 2000 words and risks is 200 words, you're not being honest.

Task Anchoring (MANDATORY — prevents drift)

The #1 failure mode is task drift — answering an adjacent, easier question.

Mechanism:

Write the user's exact question (verbatim) at the top of the research file under ## Task Anchor.
Every 5 tool calls, re-read it and ask: "Does my last action directly help answer THIS question?"
If no → STOP the current branch → re-orient.

Examples of drift:

User asks: "find real life experience where [specific event] happened"
❌ Drift: researching general requirements (answers "what's needed" not "who experienced it")
❌ Drift: reading official policy documents (answers "what's the rule" not "what happened")
✅ On-target: finding a forum thread where someone says "this happened to me: [specific event]"

The test: If your findings say "according to official policy..." instead of "user X on forum Y reported that..." — you've drifted.

Negative Results (MANDATORY — don't panic-pivot)

Sometimes the answer is: "I looked hard and didn't find it."

This is a VALID research outcome. Do NOT:

❌ Pivot to answering an adjacent question to have "something to show"
❌ Present policy/official guidance as a substitute for the anecdotes you couldn't find
❌ Inflate weak leads into findings
❌ Quote Perplexity synthesis as if it were a real source

Instead:

✅ Document exactly what you searched for and where (queries + forums + pages read)
✅ State clearly: "After [N] searches and [M] page reads across [forums], I found zero anecdotes matching [exact question]"
✅ Report adjacent findings separately: "While I didn't find X, I did find Y which is related but distinct"
✅ Assess WHY you might not have found it: rare event? wrong search terms? content behind paywalls? topic not discussed publicly?
✅ Suggest what would need to happen to find it: "This might require searching [specific forum] with a logged-in account" or "This may be too rare for public discussion"

The summary for a negative result should lead with the negative. Don't bury it under adjacent findings.

Tool Rules

General

Retailer sites (Amazon, Best Buy, etc.): ALWAYS browser-use with --profile. web_fetch cannot scrape Amazon.
Forums/reviews: web_fetch first, browser-use cascade if blocked.
Discovery: web_search (for URLs, not answers).
browser-use is a hard requirement. If not installed: pip install browser-use && browser-use install.

browser-use Cascade (try ALL 3 — no exceptions)

browser-use has 3 browser modes. You MUST try them in order. Do NOT give up after one failure.

Use this exact bash pattern:

URL="https://example.com"
SESSION="research"

# Attempt 1: chromium (free)
echo ">>> Trying chromium..."
browser-use --session $SESSION --browser chromium open "$URL" 2>&1 | tail -5
# If "url:" appears in output → SUCCESS

# Attempt 2: real (free)  
echo ">>> Trying real..."
browser-use --session $SESSION --browser real open "$URL" 2>&1 | tail -5

# Attempt 3: remote (paid, last resort)
echo ">>> Trying remote..."
browser-use --session $SESSION --browser remote open "$URL" 2>&1 | tail -5

Run all 3 in sequence. Stop at the first success. Log all attempts:

[BROWSER CASCADE: {url}]
  chromium: SUCCESS/FAIL (reason)
  real: SUCCESS/FAIL (reason)
  remote: SUCCESS/FAIL (reason)

⛔ If you get an import error (e.g., BrowserConfig not found), that's a code bug, not a site block. Fix the code (use BrowserProfile) and retry. Do NOT count code bugs as cascade failures.

⛔ NEVER give up after 1 failure. NEVER skip to "find alternative source" without trying all 3 modes. If you log only 1 attempt, the self-audit will fail you.

web_fetch Failure Escalation

When web_fetch returns 403, empty content, Cloudflare, or broken HTML:

Run the full browser-use cascade (all 3 modes)
Log: [web_fetch BLOCKED: {url} → cascade: chromium=X, real=Y, remote=Z]
Only after all 3 fail: find an alternative source (but log that you tried)

Forum-Cracking Playbook

Forums are where real experiences live. They're also the hardest to access. Use these strategies IN ORDER:

Reddit (NOTE: as of 2026, Reddit blocks most automated access including old.reddit.com):

old.reddit.com via web_fetch (try first but expect 403)
Google cache: web_search cache:reddit.com/r/[sub]/comments/[id]
Reddit aggregation sites that compile Reddit reviews by topic
browser-use cascade on reddit.com (last resort)
web_search site:reddit.com "[exact phrase]" — use citation URLs, NOT Perplexity synthesis
Fallback forums when Reddit fails: StackExchange, specialized community forums for the topic, niche discussion boards

Login-gated forums:

web_fetch (sometimes works for newer threads)

browser-use chromium + JavaScript eval to extract post content:

browser-use --session forum --browser chromium open "https://forum.example.com/thread/[ID]"
# Wait 2s for page load
browser-use --session forum --browser chromium eval "Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('[data-role=commentContent], .post-body, .message-content')).map((e,i) => 'POST ' + i + ': ' + e.innerText.substring(0,600)).join('\n===\n')"

This eval pattern extracts post content from login-gated pages — adapt selectors per forum.

Blocked forums:

web_fetch (may fail — if so, skip to browser-use)
browser-use cascade
Google cache

YouTube comments:

web_fetch on the video page (gets description + some comments)
browser-use for full comment sections

Domain-specific community forums:

Identify the top 3-5 forums for the research topic via web_search
web_fetch with /threads/ or /topic/ URLs, search via site:[forum-domain]
browser-use chromium for search, eval to extract post content
Look for practitioner blogs, review aggregation sites, and niche wikis
Academic databases for study abstracts when relevant (web_fetch works for most)

Vendor research with browser-use:

Use browser-use eval to extract product catalogs with prices
Example: document.querySelectorAll('.product-miniature') → map name + price
Always capture full catalog, not just target products

General fallback for any blocked source:

Google cache:[url] via web_fetch
Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/[url]
Google site:[domain] "[exact phrase]" to find alternative pages on the same site

Anecdote-Hunting Searches (for "find real experiences" tasks)

When the user asks for real-life experiences, first-person accounts, or anecdotes:

Use personal-language queries:

"my experience with" [topic] site:[relevant-forum]
"I tried" OR "I switched to" OR "after using" [topic] forum
"my experience" [topic] "what happened" forum
"I had to" OR "they told me" OR "turns out" [topic keywords]

DO NOT use policy-language queries:

"[topic] requirements overview" ← returns official pages, not stories
"what is needed for [topic]" ← returns guides, not experiences

Source priority for anecdotes:

Specialized forums for the topic (use browser-use eval pattern if login-gated)
Reddit (old.reddit.com → Google cache → browser-use)
Niche community forums and discussion boards
Q&A sites (real expert answers to real questions)
YouTube comments
Google site: searches with first-person language

The test: Your findings should contain direct quotes from real people, with usernames and thread URLs. If your report says "typically X happens..." instead of "user @JohnDoe42 on [Forum] reported: '...'" — you've answered a different question.

Source Verification (MANDATORY)

Never trust Perplexity/Sonar synthesis. Extract URLs only. Ignore the text.
When Sonar claims "Reddit users say X": treat it as a LEAD to find URLs, not a source.
Real user quotes must come from pages you actually fetched.
If you can't verify a forum claim: mark it [⚠️ unverified forum consensus]
⛔ FIREWALL: Unverified claims CANNOT appear in Recommendation or Executive Summary. They can appear in Detailed Findings with ⚠️ tag only.

Progressive Writing (MANDATORY — even for short sessions)

⛔ GATE: First write MUST happen after Seed phase. You CANNOT proceed to tree traversal until you've written initial findings, URL queue, and Task Anchor to the research file.

Write #1 (GATE): After Seed — Task Anchor, URL queue, search terms. No more tool calls until this write lands.
Subsequent writes: Every 3-5 tool calls — append new findings in batches.
Final write: Synthesis phase — executive summary, tree, recommendation.
⛔ NEVER accumulate all findings and write once at the end. If session crashes, all data is lost.
≤15 min sessions: minimum 3 writes. >15 min: minimum 1 write per 5 minutes.
Count writes. Every status update: 📝 [N] file writes. If N=0 after 4+ tool calls → STOP and write NOW.

Time Enforcement (WALL-CLOCK — NO GUESSING)

Setup:

START_TS=$(date +%s)
END_TS=$((START_TS + DURATION_SECONDS))
echo "START_TS=$START_TS" > /tmp/research_time
echo "END_TS=$END_TS" >> /tmp/research_time
echo "Deadline: $(date -d @$END_TS '+%H:%M:%S UTC')"

Every status check:

source /tmp/research_time
NOW=$(date +%s)
echo "Elapsed: $(( (NOW - START_TS) / 60 )) min | Remaining: $(( (END_TS - NOW) / 60 )) min"

Status format:

⏱️ [elapsed] / [committed] ([remaining] left) | 🔍 [S] searches | 📄 [R] reads | 📝 [W] writes | R>S? [yes/no]

The R>S? field: reads must exceed searches. If it says "no", stop searching and read.

Synthesis Gate (HARD — prevents finishing early)

⛔ Before starting synthesis, you MUST run this check:

source /tmp/research_time
NOW=$(date +%s)
if [ $NOW -lt $END_TS ]; then
  echo "BLOCKED: $((( END_TS - NOW ) / 60)) minutes remaining. Go back to research."
else
  echo "TIME UP: Proceed to synthesis."
fi

If the check prints "BLOCKED": You CANNOT synthesize. Go back to the Main Loop. Use the remaining time for:

New search terms (synonyms, adjacent topics, different languages)
Older threads (add year ranges: "2020", "2021", etc.)
Adjacent communities (different forums)
Cross-verifying existing findings with additional sources
Following up on leads you deprioritized earlier
YouTube comments on relevant videos

If the check prints "TIME UP": Proceed to synthesis.

Context Management (see `references/context-management.md`)

Write findings to research/[topic]-[date].md progressively.
Chat context gets summaries only — detail goes to file.
Write checkpoints every 5-10 minutes (recovery anchors after compaction).
Long sessions WILL compact — that's expected and fine.
Never stop research due to context size.

Pricing Data (when applicable)

If the research involves products/purchases:

MUST hit at least one retailer via browser-use for real pricing.
web_search price summaries are estimates, NOT verified.
Note currency, tax inclusion (e.g., regional pricing differences such as VAT inclusion vs exclusion), date of check.

Output

Research File (`research/[topic]-[date].md`)

# [Topic] Research
**Date:** [timestamp]
**Duration:** [actual time spent]
**Tools used:** [list]
**Searches:** [count] | **Deep reads:** [count] | **Ratio R:S:** [ratio]

## Task Anchor
> [User's exact question, quoted verbatim]

## Executive Summary
[3-5 bullet points — ONLY ✅ verified findings]
[If negative result: lead with "After X searches and Y page reads, no [specific thing] was found."]

## Research Tree
[SEARCH → READ → spawned → READ → etc. Shows traversal.]

## Detailed Findings
### [Category 1]
[findings with source URLs, ✅/⚠️ markers]

## Comparison Table (if applicable)

## Sources
[numbered list of URLs actually fetched — NOT search result URLs]

## Source Verification
[✅ verified (fetched actual page) | ⚠️ unverified (search synthesis) | 🔗 direct quote]

## Confidence Notes
[what's solid vs uncertain]

## Recommendation
[ONLY ✅ verified sources. If negative result, recommend next steps to find the answer.]

## Process Compliance
[Self-audit pass/fail for each gate + remediation taken]

Chat Summary

Post concise summary (<500 words) when done. Link to full research file.

Post-Research Self-Audit (HARD GATE — blocks delivery)

⛔ You CANNOT post the chat summary until every box is checked. Run the audit, fix failures, THEN deliver.

Process Gates

START_TS and END_TS set with date +%s
All time reports used real date +%s (no guessing)
Time commitment honored — verify: final date +%s ≥ END_TS
Synthesis Gate bash check was run and printed "TIME UP"
Task Anchor written to file and re-checked every 5 tool calls
No idle waiting — no sleep loops or timer countdowns. Every minute had active tool calls.

Read/Search Balance

READ_COUNT > SEARCH_COUNT — post actual numbers: reads: [R] / searches: [S]
No SEARCH→SEARCH chains outside Seed phase
Every search after Seed was preceded by at least 1 read
Dead ends tracked — reads on irrelevant pages logged as dead ends, not counted as productive reads. Post: 🪦 [D] dead ends

Writing Gates

Write #1 happened after Seed (before tree traversal)
≥3 writes for ≤15 min sessions, or 1/5min for longer
Research tree logged in file
Every status update included 📝 [N] and R>S? [yes/no]

Tool Usage Gates (EVIDENCE REQUIRED — not honor system)

⛔ For each browser-use gate, you must paste the actual command and its output. Checking a box without evidence is audit fraud.

browser-use cascade attempted — PASTE the 3 commands and outputs below:

chromium attempt: [paste command + result]
real attempt: [paste command + result]  
remote attempt: [paste command + result]

browser-use attempted before 50% of committed time (paste timestamp proof)
Every web_fetch failure escalated to full cascade — list each 403 and what you did:
```
[url] → 403 → cascade: chromium=[result], real=[result], remote=[result]
```
Reddit 403 → tried old.reddit.com first (paste the web_fetch attempt), then cascade
At least 1 successful browser-use interaction in the session

Source Quality Gates

Zero Perplexity synthesis text in Executive Summary or Recommendation
All sources have URLs from pages actually fetched
Claims marked ✅ verified / ⚠️ unverified — none unmarked
Recommendations backed ONLY by ✅ verified sources

Task Fidelity Gate

Re-read Task Anchor. Does the Executive Summary directly answer the exact question?
If user asked for anecdotes: report contains direct quotes with usernames + thread URLs
If mostly policy/guidance when anecdotes were asked: FAIL → go find stories
If negative result: summary LEADS with the negative, doesn't bury it under adjacent findings

Read Quality Gate

Count reads that actually helped answer the Task Anchor vs dead-end reads
At least 50% of reads must be on-topic (relevant to the actual question)
Dead ends logged with reason: 🪦 [url] — [why irrelevant]
URL queue was filtered for relevance before reading (didn't blindly read every Perplexity citation)

Survey Breadth Gate

Survey Phase completed in first 30% of time
Candidate list has ≥10 items (or ≥2x expected answer count for smaller topics)
Candidates written to file BEFORE deep-diving any single one
Deep-dive prioritization justified (why these candidates over others)

Source Balance Gate (for grey-area topics)

FORUM_READ_COUNT / total reads ≥ 0.4 (40% user reports)
Post actual counts: Forum reads: [F] / Study reads: [S] / Ratio: [F/(F+S)]
Real user quotes with usernames included in findings
If ratio < 0.4: explain why (e.g., "no forums exist for this topic")

Adversarial Thinking Gate

At least 1 adversarial search per 3 candidates (e.g., 9 candidates = ≥3 "dangers/risks" searches)
Each recommended candidate has a "Risks & Concerns" subsection
Mechanism chains explored (if X promotes Y for benefit, does Y also cause Z harm?)
Risks section is ≥25% the length of Benefits section
Post: Devil's advocate searches: [N] / Candidates: [M] / Ratio: [N/ceil(M/3)]

Remediation (fix before delivering)

Failure	Fix
READ_COUNT ≤ SEARCH_COUNT	Read more pages now
Missing writes	Write current findings immediately
Unverified claims in recommendation	Remove or verify them
Time not honored	Continue researching
browser-use cascade incomplete	Run remaining modes now
Task drift	Re-search with original question terms
No anecdotes when requested	Forum searches with first-person language
Only 1-2 browser modes tried	Try the remaining modes on any pending source

Anti-Patterns

Architecture violations

❌ Search addiction — firing web_search to "see what comes up" instead of reading pages in the queue. The queue is your job. Search only when it's empty or a read spawns a new question.
❌ Reading Perplexity synthesis — the synthesized text from web_search is noise. Extract URLs. Ignore text. If your findings cite "according to Perplexity..." you've failed.
❌ SEARCH→SEARCH chains after Seed — architecturally forbidden. Each search must be earned by a read.
❌ Finishing early — the Synthesis Gate bash check prevents this. Run it. TIME IS A HARD CONTRACT. If committed to 10 minutes, you work for 10 minutes. Finishing at 4 min on a 10-min commitment = CRITICAL FAILURE. If you think you're "done" early, you're NOT — run the mandatory checklist, search deeper, cross-verify, find more threads. Check date +%s against END_TS before ANY final output.
❌ Idle waiting / sleep commands — NEVER use sleep for more than 3 seconds (browser-use page loads only). Running sleep 60 to fill remaining time is a HARD FAIL that the audit WILL catch. The checklist of "things to do when done" is mandatory — run through it before claiming you're out of options.
❌ Garbage reads — reading irrelevant pages just to inflate READ_COUNT. A beginner tutorial doesn't count as a "read" when researching expert-level anecdotes. Filter the URL queue for relevance BEFORE reading. Dead-end reads must be logged as dead ends, not productive reads.
❌ Audit fraud — checking self-audit boxes for things you didn't do. If the audit says "browser-use cascade attempted" but you made zero browser-use calls, that's fabrication. The audit requires EVIDENCE (paste commands + outputs), not just checkboxes.

Content violations

❌ Answering a different question — if user wants anecdotes, don't deliver policy summaries. Re-read the Task Anchor.
❌ Panic-pivoting on negative results — "not found" is valid. Don't inflate weak leads.
❌ Unverified claims in recommendations — if you didn't fetch the page, it can't go in the recommendation.
❌ Marketing claims as benchmarks — distinguish clearly.
❌ Premature narrowing — picking 3-5 candidates in Seed and ignoring everything else. The Survey Phase exists to prevent this. You MUST cast a wide net before deep-diving. If you're deep-diving a candidate before identifying ≥10 options, you've narrowed too early.
❌ All-research, no-users — citing 10 academic papers and 0 forum threads. For grey-area topics, user reports are EQUALLY valuable. The 40% forum-read quota exists for a reason.
❌ Confirmation bias — only searching for why something works, never for why it might harm. The Adversarial Thinking section is mandatory. Every "this is great" needs a "but here's what could go wrong" search.

Tool violations

❌ Giving up after 1 browser-use failure — try ALL 3 modes. Log all attempts.
❌ Silently skipping blocked sources — web_fetch 403 → full cascade, always.
❌ web_fetch on Amazon — use browser-use with --profile.
❌ Zero browser-use calls — must attempt at least once per session.

Process violations

❌ Running in main session — always dedicated topic or sub-agent.
❌ Spawning sub-agent without full rules — paraphrasing = agent ignores rules. Paste them.
❌ Paraphrasing user's question — quote verbatim. "Find real experiences" ≠ "research whether common".
❌ Single write at end — progressive writes mandatory. Session crashes lose everything.
❌ Fabricating elapsed time — every timestamp from date +%s. No guessing.
❌ Skipping self-audit — hard gate. No exceptions.
❌ Skipping pre-flight — plan block must be posted and approved.

Long Research

Audits

Install

Long Research

Dependencies

Privacy & Trust Notes

Activation

Pre-Flight Checklist (MANDATORY — NO EXCEPTIONS)

Spawning (CRITICAL — read this before delegating to a sub-agent)

How to spawn a research sub-agent:

Common spawning mistakes:

Execution

Where to Run

The Read-Driven Loop (replaces the old "Execution Flow")

The Search Discipline

Source Balance: User Reports vs Official Research (MANDATORY)

Adversarial Thinking (MANDATORY — prevents confirmation bias)

Task Anchoring (MANDATORY — prevents drift)

Negative Results (MANDATORY — don't panic-pivot)

Tool Rules

General

browser-use Cascade (try ALL 3 — no exceptions)

web_fetch Failure Escalation

Forum-Cracking Playbook

Anecdote-Hunting Searches (for "find real experiences" tasks)

Source Verification (MANDATORY)

Progressive Writing (MANDATORY — even for short sessions)

Time Enforcement (WALL-CLOCK — NO GUESSING)

Synthesis Gate (HARD — prevents finishing early)

Context Management (see references/context-management.md)

Pricing Data (when applicable)

Output

Research File (research/[topic]-[date].md)

Chat Summary

Post-Research Self-Audit (HARD GATE — blocks delivery)

Process Gates

Read/Search Balance

Writing Gates

Tool Usage Gates (EVIDENCE REQUIRED — not honor system)

Source Quality Gates

Task Fidelity Gate

Read Quality Gate

Survey Breadth Gate

Source Balance Gate (for grey-area topics)

Adversarial Thinking Gate

Remediation (fix before delivering)

Anti-Patterns

Architecture violations

Content violations

Tool violations

Process violations

Context Management (see `references/context-management.md`)

Research File (`research/[topic]-[date].md`)