Yao Tutorial Skill

PassAudited by ClawScan on May 10, 2026.

Overview

The skill is a coherent tutorial generator, but it does run local helper scripts and may save user-supplied materials or provenance in local research files.

This skill appears safe to use for its stated purpose. Treat it like a local document-production tool: run it only from a trusted copy, install export dependencies from trusted sources, avoid supplying highly confidential material unless you plan to review/delete the research folder, and check final citations/provenance before sharing outputs.

Findings (4)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

Using the skill may execute local Python scripts in your environment to create files, screenshots, and exports.

Why it was flagged

The workflow explicitly runs local helper scripts to generate visuals, exports, and validation results. This is central to the stated tutorial-export purpose, but it is still local code execution.

Skill content
create `visuals/visual-spec.json`, then run `build_visual_pack.py` and `capture_visuals.py` ... run `export_tutorial.py` and then `validate_package.py`
Recommendation

Run it from a trusted copy of the skill, review helper scripts if the environment is sensitive, and avoid running it in directories containing unrelated private data.

What this means

You may need to rely on the packaged files and your own review rather than a fully declared registry source and install process.

Why it was flagged

The registry metadata provides limited source/install provenance while the package includes runnable scripts. The artifacts are disclosed and static scan is clean, so this is a provenance note rather than a security concern.

Skill content
Source: unknown; Homepage: none ... No install spec — this is an instruction-only skill ... Code file presence: 5 code file(s)
Recommendation

Prefer a trusted source repository when available, review local scripts before execution, and install any needed document/export tools from trusted package sources.

What this means

Private notes or source details you provide may remain in the generated local research folder even if they are removed from public exports.

Why it was flagged

The skill intentionally stores structured records about user-provided materials in local research files. This supports auditability, but those files can preserve private notes, labels, or summaries.

Skill content
Record the classification in `research/user-materials-register.md` ... `| U1 | pasted note | ... | key_takeaway | limits_or_cautions |`
Recommendation

Do not provide confidential material unless you are comfortable with local research artifacts being created; review or delete the `research/` folder before sharing the package.

What this means

A shared final tutorial may not visibly say which parts came from user-provided materials or internal source packets.

Why it was flagged

The final public artifact is instructed to avoid exposing internal provenance wording. This is disclosed and aligned with producing a polished deliverable, but it can reduce transparency if the user expects visible attribution.

Skill content
The final tutorial ... should not say it is based on a pasted article, user notes, source packet, X thread, draft, or original text. Absorb user references silently into the structure
Recommendation

Before publishing or distributing the output, review the reference section and add any attribution or provenance disclosure required for your audience, license, or organization.