Atelier Litteraire : Redaction litteraire, avec idéation et processus itératif. plusieurs agents : idéation, rédaction, jury/correcteurs.

PassAudited by ClawScan on Apr 30, 2026.

Overview

This is a local, instruction-only literary writing workflow with no code or install scripts, but it does create local project files and uses persistent project memory and multi-agent handoffs.

This skill appears appropriate for local literary ideation and drafting. Before installing, be aware that it may create and retain local project files, read a MEMORY.md file, pass real-world source dossiers between Hermine and Herbert, and use Anthropic models for processing. Use a dedicated workspace, review retained memory, and avoid providing unnecessary sensitive personal details.

Findings (6)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

Once started, the workflow may run multiple model-intensive steps before asking for a later creative choice.

Why it was flagged

The skill can automatically continue to an Opus-based reasoning step after H3 without waiting for a separate approval. This is disclosed and aligned with the ideation workflow, but it can consume model resources autonomously after invocation.

Skill content
Déclenchement : Systématique, immédiatement après H3. Toujours produit, sans attendre la validation de l'auteur sur les axes 1-2-3. Modèle : Opus
Recommendation

Confirm model budget and stopping points before starting a large project, especially if Opus usage has cost or quota implications.

What this means

Users have less external provenance information to verify the package origin and exact published version.

Why it was flagged

The registry provenance is limited, and the packaged openclaw-skill.json declares version 1.0.6. There is no executable install path, so the practical risk is limited, but the source/version mismatch is worth noticing.

Skill content
Source: unknown; Homepage: none; Version: 1.0.5
Recommendation

Install only if you trust the registry publisher, and compare the registry version with the packaged openclaw-skill.json before relying on it in important workflows.

What this means

Old project notes or poisoned memory content could influence future drafts, and sensitive writing context may persist locally longer than expected.

Why it was flagged

Herbert is instructed to read and use persistent long-term memory and current project context. This is coherent for iterative literary work, but persistent memory can carry sensitive drafts or stale instructions into later sessions.

Skill content
Lire `MEMORY.md` — les projets en cours et les leçons apprises ... Mémoire long terme dans `MEMORY.md`
Recommendation

Use a dedicated project workspace, review MEMORY.md periodically, and remove sensitive or outdated memory entries between unrelated projects.

What this means

Private or real-person source material may be shared between the skill's agents as part of the writing pipeline.

Why it was flagged

The skill intentionally passes a dossier of real-world facts from Hermine to Herbert. The handoff is purpose-aligned and the file says the dossier is confidential, but it is still a sensitive inter-agent context transfer.

Skill content
Hermine livre à l'auteur et à Herbert : ... Le dossier du réel — transmis à Herbert pour nourrir ses bibles
Recommendation

Avoid providing unnecessary personal details, and review the dossier before passing it from ideation into drafting.

What this means

If the initial structure is wrong, many generated sections may need revision before the issue is caught.

Why it was flagged

The workflow is long and iterative, so an early bad assumption in the pitch, bible, outline, or source dossier can propagate through many units. The pipeline includes jury scoring and coherence checks, which are useful containment measures.

Skill content
BOUCLE × 40-50 seeds ... Iter 1 → Iter 2 → Iter 3 ... CONTRÔLE DE COHÉRENCE — tous les 5 seeds
Recommendation

Review and approve the pacte narratif, bibles, outline, and first few seeds carefully before letting the workflow continue through all 40–50 units.

What this means

Drafts, pitches, or real-world source material may be processed by the configured model provider even though final files are saved locally.

Why it was flagged

The local-output wording is paired with a clear cloud model requirement. This is not deceptive in context, but users should not mistake local DOCX/PDF generation for fully offline processing.

Skill content
This skill operates locally by default ... Requirements: Anthropic Claude API (Sonnet for standard tasks, Opus for H4 counter-axes)
Recommendation

Read 'locally' as referring to saved outputs, and check your model provider's data handling terms before entering highly sensitive material.