TM Robot Control

WarnAudited by ClawScan on May 10, 2026.

Overview

The skill matches its robot-control purpose, but it includes runnable scripts that can move a real robot or toggle outputs without clear confirmation, so it needs careful review and supervised use.

Use only on a supervised TM robot with the workspace clear and emergency stop available. Reconfigure the hard-coded robot IP before use, start with read-only status commands, do not run test_*.py or auto motion scripts unattended, and pin/verify the techmanpy dependency.

Findings (4)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

A user or agent running the test file could unexpectedly move a real robot arm, creating equipment or safety risk.

Why it was flagged

This test module invokes multiple real robot motion commands and calls the test function at module top level, without a visible confirmation prompt or main guard. Direct execution, import, or test discovery could move a physical robot.

Skill content
robot = TMRobot('192.168.1.13') ... success = await robot.move_joint([0, 0, 90, 0, 90, 0], speed=0.3) ... success = await robot.move_relative_line([50, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], speed=0.2) ... success = await robot.move_joints_zero(speed=0.1) ... asyncio.run(test_all_motion())
Recommendation

Move all physical-motion tests behind an explicit confirmation prompt, a main guard, and a dry-run/simulation default. Do not let an agent run motion test files unattended.

What this means

Digital outputs may control attached tooling, and alarm resets can change a robot's safety state; running the script could affect hardware unexpectedly.

Why it was flagged

The script toggles robot digital output and performs stop/reset actions. These are purpose-aligned for a robot-control skill, but they are high-impact physical side effects and are not consistently gated by explicit user approval.

Skill content
await robot.set_digital_output(0, True) ... await robot.set_digital_output(0, False) ... success = await robot.stop_motion() ... success = await robot.reset_alarm()
Recommendation

Require explicit, per-action confirmation for IO changes and alarm reset, document what external equipment may be affected, and separate read-only diagnostics from mutating controls.

What this means

Users may trust unsupported or differently configured motion features and attempt movements that do not behave as described.

Why it was flagged

The skill claims full LIN/ARC motion support and 17/17 field-test success, while TEST_REPORT.md says '直线运动 (LIN) | ❌ 不支持 | techmanpy 无此方法'. For a physical robot, inconsistent capability and test-status claims make the safe operating envelope unclear.

Skill content
- ✅ 运动控制(关节 PTP、直线 LIN、圆弧 ARC) ... - 现场测试通过 (17/17)
Recommendation

Reconcile the documentation and test report, clearly label unsupported or TMflow-dependent motions, and avoid production-ready claims until the supported motion modes are unambiguous.

What this means

Installing a different techmanpy version could change robot-control behavior or compatibility.

Why it was flagged

The external robot-control dependency is disclosed and purpose-aligned, but it is broadly versioned rather than pinned. Dependency changes could affect behavior in a physical-control environment.

Skill content
"dependencies": { "techmanpy": ">=1.0.0", "asyncio": "*" }
Recommendation

Pin and verify the tested techmanpy version, and install dependencies only from trusted sources.