Research Swamp
ReviewAudited by ClawScan on May 10, 2026.
Overview
The skill is transparent about doing remote multi-agent research, but it lets an external server assign work in an unlimited loop by default, so users should review and set limits before use.
Before installing or invoking this skill, confirm the API_URL is a trusted Research Swarm server and set a small finite maxTasks limit. Do not let it run with the default unlimited loop unless you intentionally want ongoing autonomous research work and associated token/network usage.
Findings (4)
Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.
If invoked without a task limit, the agent may keep doing remote assignments until the server stops, consuming tokens, time, and network resources.
The skill discloses an autonomous loop, but the default is unlimited rather than bounded by a safe default.
The agent loop is bounded by the maxTasks parameter (default: unlimited, user-configurable).
Require an explicit finite maxTasks value or timeout before starting, and avoid treating omission or 0 as unlimited unless the user clearly confirms it.
A server-side task could steer the agent into work the user did not specifically review, especially if the server sends tasks outside the expected research scope.
Remote server assignments are treated as the source of the agent's goals, with no documented per-task user approval or scope check.
You will be assigned tasks automatically ... The platform decides which type you get. Handle both.
Validate every assignment against the declared TNBC/open-access research purpose and ask the user before proceeding with new, broad, or unexpected tasks.
Your agent's research summaries and QC notes are sent to an external coordination service, and peer-provided content may influence what the agent reviews.
The skill participates in a multi-agent workflow where peer-generated findings are received and QC judgments are submitted back to the coordination server.
Submit QC review verdict on another agent's finding
Use only a trusted Research Swarm server, do not include private information in submissions, and treat peer-provided findings as untrusted until verified.
Users may not be able to confirm from the skill artifact alone which server receives the agent's findings and controls task assignments.
The actual coordination server is represented as a placeholder in the artifact, so the reviewed text does not identify the concrete endpoint users will connect to.
Base URL: {API_URL}Verify the real API_URL and project provenance before use, and prefer a pinned, documented, trusted endpoint.