Beamer Slide

PassAudited by ClawScan on May 1, 2026.

Overview

This is a coherent Beamer slide helper that uses expected LaTeX, file-editing, and review workflows, with no evidence of hidden exfiltration or destructive behavior.

This appears safe for normal Beamer slide work. Before installing, be comfortable with it editing project files, running local LaTeX/PDF commands, and optionally using parallel review tasks; install dependencies from trusted sources and avoid using comprehensive review on confidential decks unless that is acceptable.

Findings (3)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

The agent can edit slide files and run local LaTeX/PDF commands; mistakes in paths or filenames could affect the wrong project files.

Why it was flagged

The skill is allowed to modify files and run shell commands. That is expected for compiling and editing Beamer decks, but users should ensure commands and file paths are limited to the intended project.

Skill content
allowed-tools: ["Read", "Write", "Edit", "Bash", "Grep", "Glob", "Agent", "AskUserQuestion", "TaskCreate", "TaskUpdate", "TaskList", "TaskGet"]
Recommendation

Use it in the target slide project directory, review edits before accepting them, and prefer safely quoted/validated filenames for shell commands.

What this means

Installing the suggested dependencies may add large third-party software to the local environment.

Why it was flagged

The skill depends on external system and pip packages. This is normal for LaTeX/PDF workflows, but those packages are not bundled or pinned by an install spec.

Skill content
dependencies:\n  - name: texlive-xetex\n    type: system\n    required: true\n    description: "XeLaTeX compiler ... Install via: brew install --cask mactex / apt install texlive-xetex"\n  - name: PyMuPDF\n    type: pip\n    required: false
Recommendation

Install dependencies only from trusted package managers or official sources, and avoid running ad-hoc install commands from untrusted locations.

What this means

Confidential or unpublished presentation content may be processed by parallel review agents during the excellence workflow.

Why it was flagged

The comprehensive review mode may pass the slide file into multiple parallel review tasks. The tasks are bounded to review/reporting, but sensitive deck content could be exposed to additional agent contexts.

Skill content
Launch these as concurrent review tasks:\n\n1. **Visual audit** — "Read [file]. Check every slide..."\n2. **Pedagogical review** — "Read [file]. Validate 13 pedagogical patterns..."\n3. **Proofreading** — "Read [file]. Check grammar..."
Recommendation

Use the comprehensive review only for files you are comfortable having reviewed by subagents, or request a single-agent/manual review for sensitive material.