计划验证器

Security checks across malware telemetry and agentic risk

Overview

This skill shows no credential, network, persistence, or high-impact system behavior, but its validation logic appears very lightweight and should not be treated as a strong safety gate.

This skill appears safe to install from a security-behavior perspective, but do not rely on it as a complete plan-safety validator. It does not actually verify real tool availability, permissions, dependencies, or execution feasibility in depth.

VirusTotal

VirusTotal findings are pending for this skill version.

View on VirusTotal

Risk analysis

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

#
ASI09: Human-Agent Trust Exploitation
Low
What this means

The skill may make a plan appear validated even when it has not meaningfully checked feasibility, tools, permissions, or dependencies.

Why it was flagged

A function described as checking whether a plan is realistic returns success unconditionally, which is much weaker than the skill's advertised plan-validation role.

Skill content
def check_reality(self, plan_data):
        """Check if plan is realistic"""
        return {'realistic': True, 'confidence': 0.95}
Recommendation

Use this as a lightweight checklist/helper only, and independently review important plans before execution.