期刊论文AI率降低
AdvisoryAudited by Static analysis on Apr 30, 2026.
Overview
No suspicious patterns detected.
Findings (0)
Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.
Using this skill could help submit AI-generated work as if it were human-authored, potentially violating journal, school, or publisher integrity rules.
The skill openly instructs the agent to make AI-generated academic writing pass AI-detection systems by adding human-like traits, which is deception of academic reviewers or integrity checks.
使其通过 AI 检测系统的同时具备硕士学位论文的学术水平。处理后的文本具有人类写作特征，包括...真实的引用、刻意保留的微小瑕疵。
Do not install or use this skill for evading detection. Use transparent academic editing workflows that disclose AI assistance and follow the relevant institution or journal policy.
The agent may produce academic text optimized to bypass detection rather than to accurately represent authorship, research process, or scholarly contribution.
The workflow combines citation insertion, deliberate error insertion, and a specific AI-detection-rate target, showing an intentional strategy to manipulate authenticity signals rather than merely improve clarity.
按顺序执行：...添加原文引用...植入错别字（3-5 处）...整体 AI 率目标：<15%
Reject or disable this skill as written. If repurposed, remove detection-bypass goals, deliberate error insertion, and any instruction to fabricate authenticity signals.
This could help users bypass systems meant to enforce academic integrity or authorship transparency.
The reference file gives named countermeasures for detection systems, reinforcing that the skill is built for evasion of academic and AI-authorship checks.
## 八、目标检测系统对策...### Turnitin...降低与已知文本的相似度...### GPTZero...增加文本突发性（Burstiness）
Do not use detector-specific evasion instructions. Limit any writing assistance to legitimate revision, citation verification, and disclosure-compliant editing.