Ina Mays Guide To Childbirth

Security checks across malware telemetry and agentic risk

Overview

This appears to be a childbirth guidance skill with no malware signal, but it should be reviewed because it may influence high-stakes medical decisions without clear safety boundaries.

Install only if you want educational childbirth-book guidance, not personalized medical advice. Do not rely on it for urgent symptoms, labor complications, VBAC candidacy, induction refusal, home birth safety, fetal movement concerns, bleeding, fever, severe pain, or placenta-delivery issues; those require a licensed obstetric clinician or qualified midwife.

SkillSpector

By NVIDIA
Vulnerability Patterns
  • Trigger AbuseOverly Broad Trigger, Shadow Command Trigger, Keyword Baiting Trigger
  • Prompt InjectionInstruction Override, Hidden Instructions, Exfiltration Commands
  • Data ExfiltrationExternal Transmission, Env Variable Harvesting, File System Enumeration
  • Privilege EscalationExcessive Permissions, Sudo/Root Execution, Credential Access
  • Supply ChainUnpinned Dependencies, External Script Fetching, Obfuscated Code
Findings (9)

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
84% confidence
Finding
The manifest says the skill should trigger when users mention broad terms like midwifery, home birth, VBAC, or even that they 'just installed this skill' or 'don't know how to start.' This can cause the skill to activate in contexts where the user did not explicitly request childbirth guidance, increasing the chance that sensitive medical-adjacent advice is injected unexpectedly.

Vague Triggers

Medium
Confidence
78% confidence
Finding
The Quick Start phrase 'Map this book to my life' is highly generic and can overlap with normal conversation unrelated to childbirth. In a health-related skill, vague trigger phrases are risky because they may pull the model into offering advice or framing decisions without a deliberate request.

Missing User Warnings

High
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding
This skill offers guidance on induction, epidurals, C-sections, VBAC, and home birth safety, but the description contains no clear warning that it is informational and not a substitute for professional medical care. Because users may rely on it when making time-sensitive obstetric decisions, omission of a medical disclaimer materially increases the risk of harmful self-advocacy, refusal of needed care, or delayed escalation.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding
This file gives concrete medical and childbirth management guidance, including claims about labor physiology, hospital environments, intervention framing, and comparative outcome statistics, but provides no user-facing warning that this is informational content rather than personalized medical advice. In a skill explicitly triggered by users making real pregnancy and delivery decisions, the lack of safety boundaries can cause users to defer professional evaluation, distrust indicated interventions, or make risky birth-setting choices based on generalized claims.

Missing User Warnings

Medium
Confidence
95% confidence
Finding
This file provides prescriptive childbirth and intervention-avoidance guidance in a medical context without any disclaimer that the material is educational and not individualized medical advice. Because users may rely on statements such as VBAC being safe for most women or routine procedures being unnecessary, omission of safety framing and clinician-directed escalation can contribute to harmful decision-making during pregnancy or labor.

Natural-Language Policy Violations

Low
Confidence
79% confidence
Finding
The content consistently frames pregnancy and birth in terms of 'women' and 'mother' without offering inclusive wording or adaptation for users with different gender identities. While this is not a direct technical exploit, in a healthcare-oriented skill it can alienate users, reduce trust, and discourage some pregnant people from seeking helpful information or disclosing relevant concerns.

Missing User Warnings

High
Confidence
98% confidence
Finding
This file gives prescriptive childbirth guidance that can influence time-sensitive medical decisions during labor, including advice on movement, VBAC management, avoiding epidurals, staying home in early labor, and third-stage placenta handling, without any clear warning that complications require clinician oversight and that recommendations are not universally safe. In the context of childbirth, omissions like this are dangerous because users may apply generalized advice to high-risk pregnancies, hemorrhage, fetal distress, failed VBAC, or retained placenta situations where delay in medical care can seriously harm mother or baby.

Missing User Warnings

High
Confidence
96% confidence
Finding
This file provides medical guidance and strongly framed claims about childbirth, interventions, VBAC, induction, and care settings without any warning that the content is educational rather than individualized medical advice. In this skill context, users are explicitly prompted to use the material for health decisions, which increases the risk that someone may delay, refuse, or seek care based on generalized statements that may not fit their pregnancy risk profile.

Missing User Warnings

High
Confidence
97% confidence
Finding
This file gives childbirth-related guidance, intervention framing, and decision prompts that could materially influence health and safety choices, but it does so without a clear warning that the content is educational rather than individualized medical advice. In the context of pregnancy, labor, VBAC, induction, and home birth decisions, omission of safety boundaries can cause users to over-trust the skill, delay urgent care, or reject appropriate clinical recommendations.

VirusTotal

64/64 vendors flagged this skill as clean.

View on VirusTotal