Bank Credit Investigation

PassAudited by ClawScan on May 11, 2026.

Overview

This is a conversation-only credit due diligence workflow; it appears purpose-aligned, but users should be careful with confidential borrower data and treat its credit recommendations as decision support only.

This skill looks safe to install as an instruction-only assistant. Before using it, confirm you are allowed to enter borrower financials, ownership details, litigation information, or other confidential data, and treat its credit ratings and loan recommendations as drafts that require professional review.

Findings (2)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

Users may paste confidential borrower or bank information into the assistant during analysis.

Why it was flagged

The workflow asks the user to provide borrower identity, ownership, and financial information that may be sensitive or confidential. The artifacts do not show storage or sharing, so this is purpose-aligned but worth noticing.

Skill content
Information to collect ... Company name, registration details ... Ownership structure and key shareholders ... Financial Statement Analysis
Recommendation

Only provide information you are authorized to share, redact unnecessary personal or confidential details, and follow your bank's data handling policy.

What this means

A user might rely too heavily on generated credit recommendations for high-impact financial decisions.

Why it was flagged

The skill generates credit facility, pricing, covenant, and rating-style recommendations. This is aligned with its stated purpose, but these outputs could influence real lending decisions if over-trusted.

Skill content
Based on the investigation, I will provide: Recommended Credit Facility Structure ... Amount range ... Pricing guidance ... Key Covenants
Recommendation

Use the output as drafting and analysis support only; validate conclusions against internal credit policy, source documents, regulatory requirements, and qualified human review.