Response Tone Polisher
PassAudited by ClawScan on May 1, 2026.
Overview
This appears to be a benign writing assistant for polishing reviewer responses, with only minor cautions about verifying generated wording and optional dependency installation.
This skill looks safe for polishing text. Before using its output in a real reviewer response, make sure it does not falsely say you revised, clarified, or added something. If you run the included Python script, install any dependencies cautiously in an isolated environment.
Findings (2)
Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.
A polished response could accidentally claim that a manuscript was revised or clarified when that action has not actually happened.
Some polishing templates can turn defensive language into statements that imply manuscript changes were made. That is aligned with the writing-assistance purpose, but users need to confirm the generated wording is factually true.
"But we already explained this." | "We have now expanded our explanation in Section X to provide additional detail..."
Review the final text before submission and replace any template language that does not match the actual manuscript changes.
Manual dependency installation could pull whichever current package versions are available rather than reviewed versions.
The requirements file lists package names without version pins. There is no automatic install spec, so this is only relevant if a user manually installs dependencies.
dataclasses enum
If running the script locally, use a normal isolated Python environment and pin or review dependencies before installation.