Nurse

Security checks across static analysis, malware telemetry, and agentic risk

Overview

This is an instruction-only nursing documentation aid with no code or credentials, but it may handle sensitive patient details and produce high-stakes clinical text that must be reviewed by a clinician.

This skill appears safe to install as an instruction-only drafting aid. Before using it in real care, make sure your organization allows patient information to be entered into the agent, minimize identifiable details where possible, and review every generated handover, note, care plan, or patient explanation against the patient record and local clinical policy.

Static analysis

No static analysis findings were reported for this release.

VirusTotal

VirusTotal findings are pending for this skill version.

View on VirusTotal

Risk analysis

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

Sensitive health information may be placed into the agent conversation or generated drafts.

Why it was flagged

The skill’s templates anticipate use of identifiable patient information and clinical details in prompts or generated documentation.

Skill content
"Patient name, age, MRN, bed, admitting diagnosis"
Recommendation

Use only in an approved clinical environment, follow local privacy rules, and avoid unnecessary patient identifiers when possible.

What this means

Incorrect or incomplete generated clinical documentation could affect communication between staff or patient understanding if copied without review.

Why it was flagged

The skill produces documents that may be reused across shifts, records, or care planning, so errors or unsupported assumptions could propagate in clinical workflows.

Skill content
"handover notes, care plans, incident reports"
Recommendation

Treat all output as a draft, verify facts against the patient record and local protocols, and have a qualified clinician review before use.

What this means

Users may over-trust generated medical documentation if they read the skill as guaranteeing clinical accuracy.

Why it was flagged

The skill uses strong reliability language in a high-stakes medical context, though it also states that it supports rather than replaces clinical judgment.

Skill content
"precise enough to be clinically defensible"
Recommendation

Keep the human clinician responsible for clinical judgment, and do not rely on the skill as a source of verified medical facts.