Jury
PassAudited by ClawScan on May 1, 2026.
Overview
This instruction-only skill does not request system access, but its strong claims about neutral legal and ethical arbitration should be treated as advisory rather than authoritative.
This appears safe to install from an access-control perspective because it is instruction-only and requests no local or account permissions. Treat its legal, ethical, and truth-validation outputs as advisory brainstorming rather than authoritative decisions.
Findings (1)
Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.
A user might place too much trust in the skill's verdicts for legal, ethical, or factual disputes.
The skill frames its outputs as suitable for high-stakes legal and ethical judgments and claims neutrality, but the artifact provides no detailed safeguards, validation method, or scope limits.
"deliver a balanced verdict for the most complex legal and ethical dilemmas"; "Mathematical weighting of perspectives to ensure neutrality"
Use the skill only as a deliberation aid; verify important conclusions with qualified humans and independent sources before acting.